.318 Westley Richards

AfricaHunting.com

Founder
AH ambassador
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Messages
13,319
Reaction score
9,595
Website
www.africahunting.com
Media
5,597
Articles
321
.318 Westley Richards
by Charlie Haley

The .318 Westley Richards is a real old African classic. Largely forgotten today, it was one of the most important of the pre-war sporting calibres. Never, of course, so widely used as the cheap and ubiquitous .303, it was nonetheless one of the most popular of what was termed the 'medium' bore sporting cartridges in the Africa of years ago. It was and still remains a fine choice for the Africa of today.

watermark.php

From left to right: .318 WR, .333 Jeffery, .30-06

The .318 was introduced in 1910, and was intended for Westley Richards sporting rifles with the comparatively new Model '98 Mauser action. This action and rifle was taking the world by storm, and it seemed that anyone who desired to advance himself in the eyes of his peers had to have one of these rifles; even the British army was in the process of trying to dump its Lee-Enfield .303 and adopt a Mauserderivative, along with most of the rest of the world. That they didn't actually manage to loose the Lee-Enfield for another 40 odd years is another story entirely. Suffice to say that a Mauser '98 sporter was the absolute sine qua non of the up-to-the-minute sporting gent, and here it was in a calibre bigger, better and more powerful than the .303. This was the objective all along, of course the .303 with its jacketed bullets and smokeless powder was an absolute revelation compared to black powder and lead bullets, but it quickly became evident that the old .303 was somewhat lacking in some respects, particularly against the heavier soft-skinned species. Furthermore, its rimmed case was an absolute pain in the nether regions when it came to reliable feeding in the later Mauser actions. Well, here was the answer, and the sportsmen of the day adopted it en masse.

The .318 uses a cartridge very similar (in fact, almost identical to) the American .30-06, and in fact it is quite feasible to make .318 cases from .30-06brass. The bullet is of considerably greater frontal area, however, and of a very useful greater weight. Actual bullet diameter is a somewhat confusing .330”, rather than .318 as the title suggests. This comes of the old British habit of commonly (but by no means universally) naming the cartridge by bore rather than groove diameter. The most common bullet weight was 250 grains at a listed speed of 2400 fps, which was by far the most effective and useful combination. A lightweight 180 grainer was offered at an alleged 2700 fps, but proved almost invariably to be a disappointment against all but the lighter species of game. Most of the British gunmakers of that era brought out lightweight bullets at high speed for their bolt-action rifles, so do not think that the Americans alone are guilty of a desire for velocity at all costs! My advice is to stick to the heavier bullet weight; it is more generally useful in Africa, has greater sectional density and most rifles will be sighted for it anyhow.

As stated, the .318 quickly becameimmensely popular in Africa. The 250 grain soft nosed bullets proved extremely effective and penetrative on game, while the solids if properly placed could down an elephant with a brain shot. W. D. M. ('Karamojo') Bell, one of the greatest of the old ivory hunters, used the .318 extensively. Indeed, from my readings, it seems as though he used the .318 at least as much (if not more) than the Rigby 7mm/.275 that he is most famed for using. HOWEVER justbecause Bell shot thousands of elephant with the .318 (and calibres like it), and lived to die of old age, does NOT make the .318 an elephant gun! This was a partial explanation for the eventual downfall of the .318. It became very popular extremely quickly, and is certainly one of those well balanced cartridges that performs out of all proportion to its size and paper ballistics. It was so effective that hunters started to use it against large, thick-skinned, dangerous game animals for which it was never intended. Well placed it would do the trick, but it was found wanting when things went wrong and a charge had to be stopped. Westley Richards themselves would tell you that the .318 was not designed for such stunts; that is what they designed their .425 for, and they would happily sell you one for hunting the big stuff that bit back. Hunters still used their .318's for dangerous game, though, and continued to be knocked about accordingly at times. A certain backlash was inevitable, but the .318 was still so splendidly effective against soft- skinned game that the process was more of a placing of things into perspective. Good as the .318 was, it became recognised that it did in fact have limitations after all, and that one would be well advised to take at least a .375 against the more malevolent species.

Part of the reputation for effectiveness of the .318 was unquestionably due to its being available with some of the bestbullets of the era. Being a Westley Richards calibre, the .318 could be had with soft capped bullets for expansion combined with deep penetration or the LT capped for maximum violent expansion with more limited penetration. Both bullet styles were exclusive to Westley Richards, and were certainly the premium soft noses of their day. I have only heard of one complaint regarding the .318 soft nosed bullets, and that was by a hunter who turned out to be using the light, speedy 180 grainers. He had heard so much about the awesome penetration of the .318, and couldn't understand why he wasn't achieving the same! One other potential problem; both the Westley Richards capped soft point designs superficially resembled solids, and if a shooter who wasn't in the know used a capped soft thinking it was a solid, then disappointment was sure to result.

Rifles chambered for the .318 were, of course, mainly made by Westley Richards on the Mauser action, but this was by no means universal. I have seen a few built upon modified Enfield P-14 actions, or more likely the outwardly identical American P-17. It would be a great deal easier to achieve satisfactory fit and feed for the .318 in an American .30-06 action than the British .303! Although the .318 is normally regarded as a proprietary cartridge (that is, normally only offered by the firm that introduced it), the .318 achieved such popularity that I would regard it as semi-proprietary at best. Mauser offered their 'A' grade rifle in .318 calibre, I once owned a Mauser actioned .318 sporter built by Greener, and recently examined a delightful little take-down .318 rifle by Thomas Bland (called 'The Compactum')! I have heard of a double rifle in .318 calibre (by Holland & Holland, no less) and while I have never seen one, I am certain that there must have been single shot rifles chambered for the .318 (rimless cartridge notwithstanding). There is no doubt that in the sporting fields of Africa during the 1920's and 1930's, a .318 was de rigueur for the knowledgeable hunter. It could be had in standard or take-down configuration from Westley Richards, with standard barrel lengths tending to be on the long side. Most oddly, a lot of .318's from Westley Richards had Metford style rifling. This of course led to worn and eroded bores after a lot of firing with Cordite ammunition. However, when peering down the bore of a .318, don't immediately write it off as irretrievably worn Metford rifling appears shallow and washed out in comparison to conventional lands and grooves, and it may shoot just fine. The .318's main competitor was the .333 Jeffries, also built on the Mauser action and firing a phenomenally long 300 grain bullet at a velocity of 2200 fps. This bullet gained an excellent reputation, and I have heard and read much concerning the popularity of this calibre in Africa. However, while I have examined a great many old .318 rifles, I have yet to even see a .333! It is my considered opinion that .318 rifles outnumbered .333's by a considerable margin in southern Africa.

With all the plaudits and popularity, it seemed that the .318's star would never set. However, World War Two intervened. Afterwards, it would take some years for the British gunmakers to resume sporting rifle manufacture. When they did, it was to find that the hunting fields of the world were now mainly the preserve of the American sportsman. These new nimrods, not unnaturally, wanted American rifles and calibres, and few of them had even heard of the .318. Winchester countered with their excellent .338 Magnum, which is somewhat more powerful than the .318 (which was all to the good as far as the American market went), and all this served to drive the .318 into rapid obscurity. A further clue as to the .318's demise can be gathered by a quick perusal of a 1954 Gun Digest. Westley Richards rifles are catalogued therein, available in various British calibres (including the .318) at a listed price of $400. No doubt it would have to be specially ordered, with the requisite waiting period to consider. In the same publication, however, is the adored Winchester Model 70 in a variety of American calibres, for a mere $120! Even a Super Grade Model '70 with selected walnut stock was only $195.45. Furthermore, .30-06 ammunition was half the price of .318, and a lot more available too. The old British gunmakers, without mass production and with a minimal domestic market, couldn't compete with the American makers as far as cost went. Furthermore, the British rifles were not what the American sportsman wanted at the time. The Brit rifles were hard to 'scope, and telescopic sights were in. Lightweight spitzer bullets at sizzling velocities were gaining popularity, and the English offerings with heavy, round-nosed bullets at moderate speed were out. Eventually Kynoch stopped production of virtually all the old British sporting rifle rounds, and that appeared to be the end of the .318.

Not quite, though. Ironically enough, it was the rifle-conscious Americans who led the revival, and more power to them. Tiring of the magnum craze and the glitzy rifles that went with it, the American sportsman became enamoured of classic cartridges and rifles. The effectiveness of heavy bullets at moderate speed was also re- discovered, and this all coincided with an old-time African hunting revival. Pre-war British rifles found themselves back in style again. A .318 became very much the thing to have, and a fair number of them had ended up in America over the years. Those which had escaped re-barreling were eagerly snapped up, and the Americans, being innovative as well as inveterate reloaders, did not long want for ammunition. Cases could be formed from readily available .30-06 brass, and makers of reloading dies would make whatever one wanted, but bullets continued to be a vexation. The smaller makers of custom bullets would oblige, of course, and .338 bullets could be swaged or ground to size, but the manufacturer who saved the day was Woodleigh of Australia. With impeccable timing, Woodleigh offered a whole range of bullets for a great many of the older British sporting rifles, including the .318. Furthermore, these bullets were of premium quality, taking advantage of all the benefits of modern technology. Bertrams, also of Australia, produce a similar line of high quality, properly headstamped brass cases for obsolete firearms again, included in the line up is the .318. The recently resuscitated line of Kynoch ammunition includes the .318 as well as most of the other old British sporting calibres, and, best of all, perusal of a recent catalogue showed that .318 rifles are once more available from Westley Richards! This splendid old calibre appears to be going from strength to strength, which just goes to prove that while shooting attitudes and fashions change, calibres remain as effective as they always were.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
12259681-D1A0-4EB2-B9F9-00DDD2D1A91B.jpeg
39F1A54F-0E1C-48DE-9C00-9AA4C23583FC.jpeg
FF91FED5-DF8B-40DB-9A3C-A9E463C6B2BF.jpeg

The WR takedown in 318 WR is something that I must have before I die!
 
Fortunately, I found mine some years ago. (y)

View attachment 354337

The Cogswell & Harrison 318 WR was built just after WWI on a P-14 action.
full


The take down is not the most accurate rifle I own - shooting 1.5/1.75 groups at 100 meters. The C&H will do an honest MOA.
Excellent!! Both beautiful rifles. What do you do for ammo? It doesn’t seem difficult to form but bullets are not real easy to come by it seems.
Cheers,
Cody
 
Lance Hendershot loaded 150 rounds or so for me with Woodleigh SP 250’s several years ago. Probably enough to see me through. I also have about 100 rounds of late production Kynoch solids. I have not taken either rifle to Africa, more’s the pity, but I discovered that they do work on black bear and whitetail.
 
Yep! A great round. Likely the inspiration behind the modern .338-06 wildcat.
With such a pedigree and superb versatility, I remain amazed that no major factory has made it a commercial offering yet. Within 200 to 250 yards it will do anything the .338 Win Mag does, and it will do it with considerably less recoil and noise...
 
Given its ballistics, it should have become to the world what the 30'06 is.
I think of it as part of a different class of rifle calibers. It is a true .33 and I think it fits much better in the class of the 9.3’s. For instance, it would never have the open country versatility of the 30-06 using the 150 gr bullet. The old WR shined where a hunter needed to drive a bullet deep at close to moderate range. In fact it’s almost mythical early reputation was built on the 250 gr solid, not the SP.

Of course the old ‘06 also had the additional advantage of being the companion to millions of American soldiers returning from two World Wars.

What is a bit surprising to me is that it became largely forgotten while the metric 9.3x62 has gained a new lease on life.
 
What is a bit surprising to me is that it became largely forgotten while the metric 9.3x62 has gained a new lease on life.
I would speculate, Red Leg, that the reason for this is that the 9.3x62 never fell from favor in Continental Europe where it has been one of the two dominant hunting calibers since WWII.

When I grew up, the choice was fairly simple:

- if you were going to hunt mostly in driven hunts involving primarily wild boars (always plentiful) and, later, red stag as populations expanded, then you either bought a 9.3x74R over-under double if you were financially comfortable, or a 9.3x62 bolt action. Short range massive anchoring power was desired.

- if you were going to hunt mostly in silent hunts ("approche" in French, "stalking" in English, "pirsch" in German), then you bought a bolt action 7x64. Longer range flatter trajectory was desired.

American calibers then started to become popular (e.g. .243, .270), and the Germans and Austrians always had broader choices, including various 5.6, 6.5, 7 and 8 mm with RWS and Hirtenberger ammo, but the 9.3 always was a workhorse in either inexpensive x62 or more expensive x74R chamberings, from Northern Sweden to Southern Spain, and Eastern Poland (for the few Communist Apparatchiks allowed to hunt) to Western France.

I would propose that the "new lease on life" is viewed from an American perspective, as in Europe - and Africa for that matter - the 9.3x62 never lost favor. I would guess that in Europe and Africa, a critical factor pre and post WW II was the large number of economical and reliable commercial 9.3x62 rifles built on inexpensive military M98 actions.

Conversely, the market for exquisite Westley Richards rifles was consistently limited both in pre WW II Africa (South Africa Boers and Tanganyika German colons swore by their German Mauser), and even more limited in post WW II continental Europe...
 
Last edited:
I would speculate, Red Leg, that the reason for this is that the 9.3x62 never fell from favor in Continental Europe where it has been one of the two dominant hunting calibers since WWII.

When I grew up, the choice was fairly simple:

- if you were going to hunt mostly in driven hunts involving primarily wild boars (always plentiful) and, later, red stag as populations expanded, then you either bought a 9.3x74R over-under double if you were financially comfortable, or a 9.3x62 bolt action. Short range massive anchoring power was desired.

- if you were going to hunt mostly in silent hunts ("approche" in French, "stalking" in English, "pirsch" in German), then you bought a bolt action 7x64. Longer range flatter trajectory was desired.

American calibers then started to become popular (e.g. .243, .270), and the Germans and Austrians always had broader choices, including various 5.6, 6.5, 7 and 8 mm with RWS and Hirtenberger ammo, but the 9.3 always was a workhorse in either inexpensive x62 or more expensive x74R chamberings, from Northern Sweden to Southern Spain, and Eastern Poland (for the few Communist Apparatchiks allowed to hunt) to Western France.

I would propose that the "new lease on life" is viewed from an American perspective, as in Europe - and Africa for that matter - the 9.3x62 never lost favor. I would guess that in Europe and Africa, a critical factor pre and post WW II was the large number of economical and reliable commercial 9.3x62 rifles built on inexpensive military M98 actions.

Conversely, the market for exquisite Westley Richards rifles was consistently limited both in pre WW II Africa (South Africa Boers and Tanganyika German colons swore by their German Mauser), and even more limited in post WW II continental Europe...
Good points all. Still British East Africa created the American safari experience between the wars and lasted a generation beyond. The .375 and the heavies defined the African battery in American eyes (with the obvious exception of the .458.) just surprised the 318 was not part of that transference as well. The 9.3 was a relatively late “American” addition to the battery.
 
.318 Westley Richards
by Charlie Haley

The .318 Westley Richards is a real old African classic. Largely forgotten today, it was one of the most important of the pre-war sporting calibres. Never, of course, so widely used as the cheap and ubiquitous .303, it was nonetheless one of the most popular of what was termed the 'medium' bore sporting cartridges in the Africa of years ago. It was and still remains a fine choice for the Africa of today.

watermark.php

From left to right: .318 WR, .333 Jeffery, .30-06

The .318 was introduced in 1910, and was intended for Westley Richards sporting rifles with the comparatively new Model '98 Mauser action. This action and rifle was taking the world by storm, and it seemed that anyone who desired to advance himself in the eyes of his peers had to have one of these rifles; even the British army was in the process of trying to dump its Lee-Enfield .303 and adopt a Mauserderivative, along with most of the rest of the world. That they didn't actually manage to loose the Lee-Enfield for another 40 odd years is another story entirely. Suffice to say that a Mauser '98 sporter was the absolute sine qua non of the up-to-the-minute sporting gent, and here it was in a calibre bigger, better and more powerful than the .303. This was the objective all along, of course the .303 with its jacketed bullets and smokeless powder was an absolute revelation compared to black powder and lead bullets, but it quickly became evident that the old .303 was somewhat lacking in some respects, particularly against the heavier soft-skinned species. Furthermore, its rimmed case was an absolute pain in the nether regions when it came to reliable feeding in the later Mauser actions. Well, here was the answer, and the sportsmen of the day adopted it en masse.

The .318 uses a cartridge very similar (in fact, almost identical to) the American .30-06, and in fact it is quite feasible to make .318 cases from .30-06brass. The bullet is of considerably greater frontal area, however, and of a very useful greater weight. Actual bullet diameter is a somewhat confusing .330”, rather than .318 as the title suggests. This comes of the old British habit of commonly (but by no means universally) naming the cartridge by bore rather than groove diameter. The most common bullet weight was 250 grains at a listed speed of 2400 fps, which was by far the most effective and useful combination. A lightweight 180 grainer was offered at an alleged 2700 fps, but proved almost invariably to be a disappointment against all but the lighter species of game. Most of the British gunmakers of that era brought out lightweight bullets at high speed for their bolt-action rifles, so do not think that the Americans alone are guilty of a desire for velocity at all costs! My advice is to stick to the heavier bullet weight; it is more generally useful in Africa, has greater sectional density and most rifles will be sighted for it anyhow.

As stated, the .318 quickly becameimmensely popular in Africa. The 250 grain soft nosed bullets proved extremely effective and penetrative on game, while the solids if properly placed could down an elephant with a brain shot. W. D. M. ('Karamojo') Bell, one of the greatest of the old ivory hunters, used the .318 extensively. Indeed, from my readings, it seems as though he used the .318 at least as much (if not more) than the Rigby 7mm/.275 that he is most famed for using. HOWEVER justbecause Bell shot thousands of elephant with the .318 (and calibres like it), and lived to die of old age, does NOT make the .318 an elephant gun! This was a partial explanation for the eventual downfall of the .318. It became very popular extremely quickly, and is certainly one of those well balanced cartridges that performs out of all proportion to its size and paper ballistics. It was so effective that hunters started to use it against large, thick-skinned, dangerous game animals for which it was never intended. Well placed it would do the trick, but it was found wanting when things went wrong and a charge had to be stopped. Westley Richards themselves would tell you that the .318 was not designed for such stunts; that is what they designed their .425 for, and they would happily sell you one for hunting the big stuff that bit back. Hunters still used their .318's for dangerous game, though, and continued to be knocked about accordingly at times. A certain backlash was inevitable, but the .318 was still so splendidly effective against soft- skinned game that the process was more of a placing of things into perspective. Good as the .318 was, it became recognised that it did in fact have limitations after all, and that one would be well advised to take at least a .375 against the more malevolent species.

Part of the reputation for effectiveness of the .318 was unquestionably due to its being available with some of the bestbullets of the era. Being a Westley Richards calibre, the .318 could be had with soft capped bullets for expansion combined with deep penetration or the LT capped for maximum violent expansion with more limited penetration. Both bullet styles were exclusive to Westley Richards, and were certainly the premium soft noses of their day. I have only heard of one complaint regarding the .318 soft nosed bullets, and that was by a hunter who turned out to be using the light, speedy 180 grainers. He had heard so much about the awesome penetration of the .318, and couldn't understand why he wasn't achieving the same! One other potential problem; both the Westley Richards capped soft point designs superficially resembled solids, and if a shooter who wasn't in the know used a capped soft thinking it was a solid, then disappointment was sure to result.

Rifles chambered for the .318 were, of course, mainly made by Westley Richards on the Mauser action, but this was by no means universal. I have seen a few built upon modified Enfield P-14 actions, or more likely the outwardly identical American P-17. It would be a great deal easier to achieve satisfactory fit and feed for the .318 in an American .30-06 action than the British .303! Although the .318 is normally regarded as a proprietary cartridge (that is, normally only offered by the firm that introduced it), the .318 achieved such popularity that I would regard it as semi-proprietary at best. Mauser offered their 'A' grade rifle in .318 calibre, I once owned a Mauser actioned .318 sporter built by Greener, and recently examined a delightful little take-down .318 rifle by Thomas Bland (called 'The Compactum')! I have heard of a double rifle in .318 calibre (by Holland & Holland, no less) and while I have never seen one, I am certain that there must have been single shot rifles chambered for the .318 (rimless cartridge notwithstanding). There is no doubt that in the sporting fields of Africa during the 1920's and 1930's, a .318 was de rigueur for the knowledgeable hunter. It could be had in standard or take-down configuration from Westley Richards, with standard barrel lengths tending to be on the long side. Most oddly, a lot of .318's from Westley Richards had Metford style rifling. This of course led to worn and eroded bores after a lot of firing with Cordite ammunition. However, when peering down the bore of a .318, don't immediately write it off as irretrievably worn Metford rifling appears shallow and washed out in comparison to conventional lands and grooves, and it may shoot just fine. The .318's main competitor was the .333 Jeffries, also built on the Mauser action and firing a phenomenally long 300 grain bullet at a velocity of 2200 fps. This bullet gained an excellent reputation, and I have heard and read much concerning the popularity of this calibre in Africa. However, while I have examined a great many old .318 rifles, I have yet to even see a .333! It is my considered opinion that .318 rifles outnumbered .333's by a considerable margin in southern Africa.

With all the plaudits and popularity, it seemed that the .318's star would never set. However, World War Two intervened. Afterwards, it would take some years for the British gunmakers to resume sporting rifle manufacture. When they did, it was to find that the hunting fields of the world were now mainly the preserve of the American sportsman. These new nimrods, not unnaturally, wanted American rifles and calibres, and few of them had even heard of the .318. Winchester countered with their excellent .338 Magnum, which is somewhat more powerful than the .318 (which was all to the good as far as the American market went), and all this served to drive the .318 into rapid obscurity. A further clue as to the .318's demise can be gathered by a quick perusal of a 1954 Gun Digest. Westley Richards rifles are catalogued therein, available in various British calibres (including the .318) at a listed price of $400. No doubt it would have to be specially ordered, with the requisite waiting period to consider. In the same publication, however, is the adored Winchester Model 70 in a variety of American calibres, for a mere $120! Even a Super Grade Model '70 with selected walnut stock was only $195.45. Furthermore, .30-06 ammunition was half the price of .318, and a lot more available too. The old British gunmakers, without mass production and with a minimal domestic market, couldn't compete with the American makers as far as cost went. Furthermore, the British rifles were not what the American sportsman wanted at the time. The Brit rifles were hard to 'scope, and telescopic sights were in. Lightweight spitzer bullets at sizzling velocities were gaining popularity, and the English offerings with heavy, round-nosed bullets at moderate speed were out. Eventually Kynoch stopped production of virtually all the old British sporting rifle rounds, and that appeared to be the end of the .318.

Not quite, though. Ironically enough, it was the rifle-conscious Americans who led the revival, and more power to them. Tiring of the magnum craze and the glitzy rifles that went with it, the American sportsman became enamoured of classic cartridges and rifles. The effectiveness of heavy bullets at moderate speed was also re- discovered, and this all coincided with an old-time African hunting revival. Pre-war British rifles found themselves back in style again. A .318 became very much the thing to have, and a fair number of them had ended up in America over the years. Those which had escaped re-barreling were eagerly snapped up, and the Americans, being innovative as well as inveterate reloaders, did not long want for ammunition. Cases could be formed from readily available .30-06 brass, and makers of reloading dies would make whatever one wanted, but bullets continued to be a vexation. The smaller makers of custom bullets would oblige, of course, and .338 bullets could be swaged or ground to size, but the manufacturer who saved the day was Woodleigh of Australia. With impeccable timing, Woodleigh offered a whole range of bullets for a great many of the older British sporting rifles, including the .318. Furthermore, these bullets were of premium quality, taking advantage of all the benefits of modern technology. Bertrams, also of Australia, produce a similar line of high quality, properly headstamped brass cases for obsolete firearms again, included in the line up is the .318. The recently resuscitated line of Kynoch ammunition includes the .318 as well as most of the other old British sporting calibres, and, best of all, perusal of a recent catalogue showed that .318 rifles are once more available from Westley Richards! This splendid old calibre appears to be going from strength to strength, which just goes to prove that while shooting attitudes and fashions change, calibres remain as effective as they always were.
Well said, I love my 318 TD WR!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.01 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.01 AM Large.jpeg
    157.8 KB · Views: 62
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.02 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.02 AM Large.jpeg
    182 KB · Views: 67
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.03 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.03 AM Large.jpeg
    255.5 KB · Views: 60
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.04 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.04 AM Large.jpeg
    170.4 KB · Views: 61
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.05 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.05 AM Large.jpeg
    191.4 KB · Views: 72
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.06 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.06 AM Large.jpeg
    103.1 KB · Views: 62
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.07 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.07 AM Large.jpeg
    74.5 KB · Views: 64
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.09 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.09 AM Large.jpeg
    161.3 KB · Views: 59
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.10 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.10 AM Large.jpeg
    213.6 KB · Views: 64
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.11 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.11 AM Large.jpeg
    174.1 KB · Views: 54
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.12 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.12 AM Large.jpeg
    195.7 KB · Views: 57
  • Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.13 AM Large.jpeg
    Screen Shot 2023-05-14 at 8.04.13 AM Large.jpeg
    135.2 KB · Views: 56
I think of it as part of a different class of rifle calibers. It is a true .33 and I think it fits much better in the class of the 9.3’s. For instance, it would never have the open country versatility of the 30-06 using the 150 gr bullet. The old WR shined where a hunter needed to drive a bullet deep at close to moderate range. In fact it’s almost mythical early reputation was built on the 250 gr solid, not the SP.

Of course the old ‘06 also had the additional advantage of being the companion to millions of American soldiers returning from two World Wars.

What is a bit surprising to me is that it became largely forgotten while the metric 9.3x62 has gained a new lease on life.
Here we are , in a modern sense, comparing the 338-06 to the 9.3. Then we enter into the discussion of 35 Whelen vs. 338-06. Both really aren't in a similar ballpark as the 9.3 but like AA farm league versus AAA on way to majors.. Still ... it is all about packaging. Take a look at the 330 BSA. Belted and with a little work on the case length, heavier bullet and bingo... 338 Win Mag. Would I like a 318... sure!
 
Fortunately, I found mine some years ago. (y)

View attachment 354337

The Cogswell & Harrison 318 WR was built just after WWI on a P-14 action.
full


The take down is not the most accurate rifle I own - shooting 1.5/1.75 groups at 100 meters. The C&H will do an honest MOA.
Stunning rifles!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
57,895
Messages
1,242,500
Members
102,281
Latest member
chris Dube
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
(cont'd)
Rockies museum,
CM Russel museum and lewis and Clark interpretative center
Horseback riding in Summer star ranch
Charlo bison range and Garnet ghost town
Flathead lake, road to the sun and hiking in Glacier NP
and back to SLC (via Ogden and Logan)
Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
Good Morning,
I plan to visit MT next Sept.
May I ask you to give me your comments; do I forget something ? are my choices worthy ? Thank you in advance
Philippe (France)

Start in Billings, Then visit little big horn battlefield,
MT grizzly encounter,
a hot springs (do you have good spots ?)
Looking to buy a 375 H&H or .416 Rem Mag if anyone has anything they want to let go of
Erling Søvik wrote on dankykang's profile.
Nice Z, 1975 ?
Tintin wrote on JNevada's profile.
Hi Jay,

Hope you're well.

I'm headed your way in January.

Attending SHOT Show has been a long time bucket list item for me.

Finally made it happen and I'm headed to Vegas.

I know you're some distance from Vegas - but would be keen to catch up if it works out.

Have a good one.

Mark
 
Top