So I’m in the 18-24 month window for taking possession (to include the ordering/waiting) of a double. I used to be perfectly fine with my bolt guns but you guys talk too much about doubles and there are too many videos on YouTube and now I can’t live without a double. Specifically interested in Heym, again, largely this forum’s fault.
Ive not yet hunted Africa but it’s now in my 5 year plan to go on my first safari for Buffalo and plains game. I live in the southeastern US and mostly hunt black bear, pigs, and whitetail. I’m increasing trips for elk and considering other big critters here. I tend to only hunt with one gun (I run a custom 300wsm for everything right now) and know/shoot it very well. I also tend to practice a lot and shoot about 40-60 rounds with my hunting gun 6-8 times a year (with more from other rifles, shotguns, and handguns).
While the Africa bug may bite hard after the first trip, I’ve got young kids so I think for the next decade or two trips to Africa will be rare while I’ll hunt a lot in the US.
As such, I’ve been planning for a Heym 89 in 375 flanged. It seems perfect for someone who hunts North American big game with rare trips to Africa for buff and plains game. And if I chose to go after elephant one day I’m sure it would do the trick. On top of that, it wouldn’t be as fatiguing trying to practice up to get skilled with it like a 470 or 500.
I’ve been planning to go to Dallas to shoot a few of these things to make sure that’s what I’m interested in before the order.
All that said, I’m considering getting a used Heym to play around with a lot and get to know before investing in one where I pick all the options. I’d hate to go shoot once, order a gun, and figure out if I’d shot more id have ordered something different (or even that I don’t really like shooting doubles ). Looking around though, Heyms in 375 are rarer than hen’s teeth.
that brings a few questions into focus:
-there are a bunch of 450/400 heyms for sale. I’m surprised by this because I can’t well identify any objective benefits of the 450/400 over the 375. At less than 100yds, energy is nearly identical between the 450/400 and the 375fl and the belted case exceeds the 450/400. Bullet selection is far greater with 375 caliber and as such, with the right bullet, the 375 easily bests available bullets in the 450/400 for game shot beyond 100yds. Also, I’ve got a 375 H&H and a 416 rem mag and while I don’t have any ballistics gel, solids from both pass through a 16 inch pine tree without issue (aware this methodology doesn’t prove much, it just impressed the hell out of me and argues for the capability of cartridges in this class). I feel like penetration even on big stuff should be more than adequate with the 375 as is indicated by its history of use these last 100 years. And increasing the caliber to the degree of difference between .375 and .410 seems somewhat inconsequential relative to the vitals size, especially as a percentage of the surface area exposed on these animals when aiming. All that said, plenty on these forums as well as gunwriters argue to an obvious improvement in terminal ballistics on game. somebody please argue with me that the 450/400 is clearly superior so I won’t feel bad about picking up a used one of those as my first double over ordering a 375fl.
PLEASE NOTE that this isn a criticism of the 450/400. I think it’s a great caliber and if I were buying a gun specifically for Africa or I liked using more than one gun to hunt (I don’t know why I’m so weird about that) it would easily be my caliber of choice. To be honest, the cool factor associated with an old nitro express caliber is enough to choose it over a 375 anyway. Also, I don’t really like shooting beyond 150yds because I enjoy the stalk too much. So maybe there’s no reason to consider the 375 and the 450/400nis perfect?
-if getting a 375 double, would anyone argue for the extra horsepower (2400 vs 2550 FPS) and availability of the belted over the flanged cartridge? I feel like the KISS mentality demands going with a rimmed cartridge so as not to invite issue and the success of the 9.3x74, even on dangerous game, indicates the decrease in velocity should be fine. Thoughts?
-anyone that can speak to the custom fit/optioned double vs a used double for a first time double rifle buyer?
thanks all for your thoughts on this as well as all your previous discussions that I’ve poured over these last few months. The forum is great!
Ive not yet hunted Africa but it’s now in my 5 year plan to go on my first safari for Buffalo and plains game. I live in the southeastern US and mostly hunt black bear, pigs, and whitetail. I’m increasing trips for elk and considering other big critters here. I tend to only hunt with one gun (I run a custom 300wsm for everything right now) and know/shoot it very well. I also tend to practice a lot and shoot about 40-60 rounds with my hunting gun 6-8 times a year (with more from other rifles, shotguns, and handguns).
While the Africa bug may bite hard after the first trip, I’ve got young kids so I think for the next decade or two trips to Africa will be rare while I’ll hunt a lot in the US.
As such, I’ve been planning for a Heym 89 in 375 flanged. It seems perfect for someone who hunts North American big game with rare trips to Africa for buff and plains game. And if I chose to go after elephant one day I’m sure it would do the trick. On top of that, it wouldn’t be as fatiguing trying to practice up to get skilled with it like a 470 or 500.
I’ve been planning to go to Dallas to shoot a few of these things to make sure that’s what I’m interested in before the order.
All that said, I’m considering getting a used Heym to play around with a lot and get to know before investing in one where I pick all the options. I’d hate to go shoot once, order a gun, and figure out if I’d shot more id have ordered something different (or even that I don’t really like shooting doubles ). Looking around though, Heyms in 375 are rarer than hen’s teeth.
that brings a few questions into focus:
-there are a bunch of 450/400 heyms for sale. I’m surprised by this because I can’t well identify any objective benefits of the 450/400 over the 375. At less than 100yds, energy is nearly identical between the 450/400 and the 375fl and the belted case exceeds the 450/400. Bullet selection is far greater with 375 caliber and as such, with the right bullet, the 375 easily bests available bullets in the 450/400 for game shot beyond 100yds. Also, I’ve got a 375 H&H and a 416 rem mag and while I don’t have any ballistics gel, solids from both pass through a 16 inch pine tree without issue (aware this methodology doesn’t prove much, it just impressed the hell out of me and argues for the capability of cartridges in this class). I feel like penetration even on big stuff should be more than adequate with the 375 as is indicated by its history of use these last 100 years. And increasing the caliber to the degree of difference between .375 and .410 seems somewhat inconsequential relative to the vitals size, especially as a percentage of the surface area exposed on these animals when aiming. All that said, plenty on these forums as well as gunwriters argue to an obvious improvement in terminal ballistics on game. somebody please argue with me that the 450/400 is clearly superior so I won’t feel bad about picking up a used one of those as my first double over ordering a 375fl.
PLEASE NOTE that this isn a criticism of the 450/400. I think it’s a great caliber and if I were buying a gun specifically for Africa or I liked using more than one gun to hunt (I don’t know why I’m so weird about that) it would easily be my caliber of choice. To be honest, the cool factor associated with an old nitro express caliber is enough to choose it over a 375 anyway. Also, I don’t really like shooting beyond 150yds because I enjoy the stalk too much. So maybe there’s no reason to consider the 375 and the 450/400nis perfect?
-if getting a 375 double, would anyone argue for the extra horsepower (2400 vs 2550 FPS) and availability of the belted over the flanged cartridge? I feel like the KISS mentality demands going with a rimmed cartridge so as not to invite issue and the success of the 9.3x74, even on dangerous game, indicates the decrease in velocity should be fine. Thoughts?
-anyone that can speak to the custom fit/optioned double vs a used double for a first time double rifle buyer?
thanks all for your thoughts on this as well as all your previous discussions that I’ve poured over these last few months. The forum is great!
Last edited: