I used to (embarrassed) be a swaro snob until my last two. I found out although professionally mounted ran out of horizontal centering meaning I ran out of clicks. On a scope forum I found out that was fairly common. I sold all my Swaro and converted to all Leupold and never looked back. I love the fire dot reticleI did not click on a choice above. While I think a Leupold VX5HD with CDS and a Firedot reticle is fantastic, I think you’d be much better served with a 2-10 than a 3-15. I have VX5HD scopes on all four rifles that I hunt with. My .338 & .375 both have the 2-10 and it’s ideal for those, as it would be for a 30-06. I’ve got a 3-15, but it’s on my .264 and I do shoot it much farther than the other guns. Inside 400 yards the 10x top end is plenty.
Very much appreciate your insightI did not click on a choice above. While I think a Leupold VX5HD with CDS and a Firedot reticle is fantastic, I think you’d be much better served with a 2-10 than a 3-15. I have VX5HD scopes on all four rifles that I hunt with. My .338 & .375 both have the 2-10 and it’s ideal for those, as it would be for a 30-06. I’ve got a 3-15, but it’s on my .264 and I do shoot it much farther than the other guns. Inside 400 yards the 10x top end is plenty.
You’re right there, IMO. I have a Pre-64 Featherweight 30-06 that is topped with a Leupold VX3 in 2.5-8x. I haven’t changed it out since it’s a great scope for that rifle, as well as being a bit lighter and more compact than the VX5’s. The only thing I wish it had that’s lacking is the Firedot reticle.A Leupold 2x7 is just perfect.
Wow! Sounds like something was wrong with the bases or screw alignment. That would be something like 24” off at 100.I used to (embarrassed) be a swaro snob until my last two. I found out although professionally mounted ran out of horizontal centering meaning I ran out of clicks. On a scope forum I found out that was fairly common. I sold all my Swaro and converted to all Leupold and never looked back. I love the fire dot reticle