My first report was not favorable, had a bad hunt, had a lot of replies. My second report was good, hardly any replies.
Just curious if peeps like bad reports better?
In terms of selling the story, there is no news like bad news.
On my side, I have rad the report with great interest. Both reports.
But generally on this forum, many times I restrain myself from commenting - mostly as I am newbie in African hunting, and my inexperienced views may hardly contribute to discussion on hand.
I appreciate the honesty, and having the balls.
To write bad report, a man must have the balls, and arguments, and be ready for eventual back fire, and then to keep the stand, or even to admit flaws or errors on his side, or be flexible to work out other solutions if suggested. Many times the situations is not black & white, and sometimes it may be hard to admit it.
Many would just bite the tongue, forget about, moved on and never looked back, far from publicly reporting bad experience.
There have been some bad feedback reports here on the forum, and if not well argumented, generally the post (and author) could get bad reception, and very low to none support from the community.
Personally, occasional bad feedback report give me the taste of reality of this forum.
So, I appreciate your courage to speak up, honesty and your feedbacks.