Know The Facts & Speak Out

robertq

AH fanatic
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
689
Reaction score
631
Location
Wallkill, NY
Media
1
Articles
21
Member of
Life member of DSC, SCI, NRA, Rocky Mt Elk Foundation, American Hunter, Buck Masters & Ruffed Grouse Society
Hunted
Russia, Argentina, Canada & South Africa
ele.jpg



Know the Facts and Speak Out


BY RICHARD T. CHEATHAM, DSC FOUNDATION PRESIDENT

This article is featured in the Spring 2017 issue of Game Trails, our quarterly publication for DSC members.

Hunting, as an essential element of a well-managed wildlife management plan, works. It protects wildlife. It preserves wild places. It feeds the hungry. It brings benefit to the people who live and work among wildlife.

Here are some facts you should know.

About funds contributed by U.S. sportsmen and women:


• $823 million was raised from Pittman-Robertson excise taxes in 2016.

• $18 billion has been generated since the PR Act was passed in 1937.

• $81 million was generated by sale of Federal Duck stamps last year and $800 million has been raised since the Federal Duck Stamp program was created.

• $821 million of revenue was generated from the sale of hunting licenses in 2016.

Who paid that money? Hunters.

On feeding America’s hungry:

• Over 8.1 million meals were provided through the Hunters for the Hungry program last year. That’s 2.1 million pounds of game meat.

On feeding Africa’s hungry:

• Over 135,000 pounds of game meat was distributed by the operator of a single hunting organization in Mozambique over the last three years.

• Over 285,000 pounds of game meat was distributed in Zambia last year, the equivalent of over 1 million meals.

Who provided that meat? Hunters.

On the protection and conservation of wildlife In the U.S.

• Whitetails: In the early 1900s, there were fewer than 500,000 total white-tailed deer in the continental U.S. The estimated current population is over 32 million. There are more white-tailed deer in the Texas Hill Country today than there were in the entire U.S. in 1910. In 2015, Texas hunters harvested more deer than existed in the U.S. a century ago.

• Rocky Mountain Elk: In 1900 – 41,000. Now – 1 million. • Pronghorns: In 1900 – 12,000. Today – 1.1 million.

• Wild turkey have been successfully reintroduced in every one of the lower 48 states. There were 100,000 in the U.S. in the early 1900s. Today there are more than 7 million.

Internationally

• Namibia: elephant numbers grew from 7,000 to over 20,000. Mountain Zebra expanded from 1,000 to over 27,000.

• Bubye Valley Conservancy introduced 17 lions 21 years ago. Today there are more than 500.

• Republic of South Africa and Namibia: white rhinos grew in number from 1,800 to 19,200 since 1968. 45 years ago in South Africa there were 557,000 wild game animals. Today there are more than 18 million. Namibia’s game population has increased 200 percent since the 1970s. • Mozambique (Coutada 11) – 44 sables have grown to over 4,000 today.

Who’s responsible for those remarkable numbers? Hunters.

What now?

Arm yourselves with the facts and help DSC and DSC Foundation turn the tide of public sentiment. Counter the emotion-based arguments with facts on the benefits of hunting. Use the examples provided here. Memorize them. Verify them if you have any doubts. And be prepared. DSC and DSC Foundation are about to change the conversation. When someone asks you why we hunt, try this: tell them we hunt for the adventure it brings to life. We hunt to feed ourselves and others. We hunt so that our grandchildren and great-grandchildren will experience freeranging wildlife in natural habitats rather than animals in zoos. We hunt so that future generations can share our proud hunting heritage. We hunt to benefit the people whose livelihoods depend on a time-tested wildlife policy grounded in sustainable use. Tell them we hunt for life.



Source: Dalas Safari Club News Center
 
Great ammunition! Thanks for sharing sir!
 
This is good, basic information all hunters should be able to speak to when discussing conservation efforts.

Thank you for posting.
 
Where are articles like this shared, other than hunting sites and hunting magazines, so that they reach the non-hunting crowd.
By non-hunters i mean the people that are not (yet) demonically anti-hunting?
FB would be a bad place because of all the responses and stupid comments that would arise.
 
It is indeed good ammunition!
 
Excellent really, thanks.
 
Where are articles like this shared, other than hunting sites and hunting magazines, so that they reach the non-hunting crowd.
By non-hunters i mean the people that are not (yet) demonically anti-hunting?
FB would be a bad place because of all the responses and stupid comments that would arise.

I disagree about FB being a bad place. Your friends on FB are the most likely people to be converted by you if you post this information and then defend it in a discussion. If the person is your "friend" then they are going to treat you as a person, not a faceless, nameless evil entity "trophy hunter" serial killer that is being portrayed by the ARA crowd. You will have the facts on your side and the positive predisposition that will allow these people to actually listen to you instead of ignore you.

I am not going to be able to convince the world that hunting is OK and necessary. What I can do is convince the people that I know and that know me. If we all do that, then we will cover enough of the people who are not firmly entrenched in the anti-camp to get the majority of the population on our side.

We cannot do that preaching to the choir and we certainly cannot do that by not engaging our friends about it. I don't want to be in their face about it like people are about their rescue pit bull puppies, but I don't want to hide that I am a hunter or the information that shows the good hunting does. When the Anti crowd comes around to talk about the evil trophy hunter, I want my friends to think "I know Mike, he isn't like that at all" and then maybe realize they are being fed a line of BS from the ARA crowd.
 
I disagree about FB being a bad place. Your friends on FB are the most likely people to be converted by you if you post this information and then defend it in a discussion. If the person is your "friend" then they are going to treat you as a person, not a faceless, nameless evil entity "trophy hunter" serial killer that is being portrayed by the ARA crowd. You will have the facts on your side and the positive predisposition that will allow these people to actually listen to you instead of ignore you.

I am not going to be able to convince the world that hunting is OK and necessary. What I can do is convince the people that I know and that know me. If we all do that, then we will cover enough of the people who are not firmly entrenched in the anti-camp to get the majority of the population on our side.

We cannot do that preaching to the choir and we certainly cannot do that by not engaging our friends about it. I don't want to be in their face about it like people are about their rescue pit bull puppies, but I don't want to hide that I am a hunter or the information that shows the good hunting does. When the Anti crowd comes around to talk about the evil trophy hunter, I want my friends to think "I know Mike, he isn't like that at all" and then maybe realize they are being fed a line of BS from the ARA crowd.

That is possible, if on FB you can avoid all the stupidity that has arisen around just about every public discussion on hunting.
I have seen many public discussions turn into a shouting match with everyone calling everyone names and nothing constructive comes of it.
Posts on FB to friends are private if you set your preferences ( i think, im not too savvy on how that all works ), i worry about the discussion getting out of hand and then it turns out to be counter productive.
So my question was more to do with how can we get the message to a crowd of people without having to wade through all the crap that often surrounds hunting debates.
Remember, many people are sheep and will follow anyone, we need to get them following "us" rather than "them".

I will not use FB as my friends, and i use this term loosely, are from a variety of places i have lived and vastly different communities, backgrounds etc.
I have many anti hunting friends, actual proper friends whom i see weekly, i have many hunting friends whom i see weekly, and a bunch of in-betweeners who i have managed to change their 0pinion from being anti hunting to accepting hunting. They will not hunt, but they will not speak badly to me about what i do. I dont think that i could have engaged them and convinced them on FB as opposed to in person as i have.

If you have success on FB, go big bud, I'm all for it. (y)
I am certainly not trying to convince you not to do it based on what you said and how you can address your friends. Perhaps i should have included that in my first message to be more conditional based on the people in your friends list.
 
Where are articles like this shared, other than hunting sites and hunting magazines, so that they reach the non-hunting crowd.
By non-hunters i mean the people that are not (yet) demonically anti-hunting?
FB would be a bad place because of all the responses and stupid comments that would arise.

@mrpoindexter nailed it Pete.

FB is perfect place to share.

We can't let people screaming at is keep us quiet. It's part of their strategy. To make us ashamed and not to educate...

It's a fine line. I try not to post too much to FB because I want people to read and not think it is all spam. But I do think it's important to post.
 
@mrpoindexter nailed it Pete.

FB is perfect place to share.

We can't let people screaming at is keep us quiet. It's part of their strategy. To make us ashamed and not to educate...

It's a fine line. I try not to post too much to FB because I want people to read and not think it is all spam. But I do think it's important to post.
Fair enough, my opinion only...

I think its not the right spot... I wont try convince any one not to, but i wont do it on FB.
 
Fair enough, my opinion only...

I think its not the right spot... I wont try convince any one not to, but i wont do it on FB.

And your opinion is valued by all, except @spike.t . LOL

I just think we should fight anywhere the antis do. We can't always pick and choose the battle field.
 
Using FB, I mean on your personal wall, not on a public discussion page. Those are infiltrated by ARAs that swarm over the site like ANTIFA. Your own personal page will have a discussion that keeps those kinds of people away and you always have the option of deleting their crap.

Also, their personal attacks backfire often when they come on and just swear at you and call you a murdering c#nt if everybody reading knows you personally. It becomes an attack on their friend and their instinctive reaction is to come to your defense which puts them arguing on behalf of hunting or at least on behalf of a hunter who then can show all the good he is doing, the people being fed, etc. It can expose the ARA group's lack of humanity and compassion for people, which is also necessary for us to win the fight.
 
Using FB, I mean on your personal wall, not on a public discussion page.
Ok, we're on the same page then. I was thinking about sharing the post in general on fb.
If you keep it within your friend group as I said above I think that'd give you better control of the discussion and arguments.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
57,908
Messages
1,242,730
Members
102,300
Latest member
joe laws
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
(cont'd)
Rockies museum,
CM Russel museum and lewis and Clark interpretative center
Horseback riding in Summer star ranch
Charlo bison range and Garnet ghost town
Flathead lake, road to the sun and hiking in Glacier NP
and back to SLC (via Ogden and Logan)
Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
Good Morning,
I plan to visit MT next Sept.
May I ask you to give me your comments; do I forget something ? are my choices worthy ? Thank you in advance
Philippe (France)

Start in Billings, Then visit little big horn battlefield,
MT grizzly encounter,
a hot springs (do you have good spots ?)
Looking to buy a 375 H&H or .416 Rem Mag if anyone has anything they want to let go of
Erling Søvik wrote on dankykang's profile.
Nice Z, 1975 ?
Tintin wrote on JNevada's profile.
Hi Jay,

Hope you're well.

I'm headed your way in January.

Attending SHOT Show has been a long time bucket list item for me.

Finally made it happen and I'm headed to Vegas.

I know you're some distance from Vegas - but would be keen to catch up if it works out.

Have a good one.

Mark
 
Top