I went down this rabbit hole recently. Not an expert but here is what i gathered.
I have a Leopold 2-7 on a 308 that has held up well. Short of tracking a wound animal in thick brush I think it's a good size. 2x works in pretty tight brush. The eye relief should be fine.
Now the bad news. I don't think all Leopolds are as good as they claim. Better than Chinese made brands, yes. One of the best brands for big kickers, yes. Occasionally someone will report bad luck with a Leopold.
1. Really big rifles seem to break Leopolds (and most everything else). Not a problem with a 375 I suspect.
2. Some folks report problems holding zero here and on other sites after "abuse" i.e. rough flights, bumps, drops, etc. My 1-4 Leopold might have done this a bit, not sure. Enough to miss a charging bear, no. Enough to be concerned about at 300 yards, maybe. Enough to annoy a perfectionist , yes. Or it could be the QD rings (more on that later).
Bottom line. If you want cheaper I would go with your Leopold or sell it for a 1-4 Leopold. Get to know your rifle with it. Eventually, a Trijicon might be worth it. On other websites people claim the Trijicon Tenmile and Credo have survived drop tests of 3 feet and held zero. Are they better than a Leopold? Some think so. I'm sure they are at least as good. Besides I like the illuminated reticle.
On QD rings. I really like my Alaska Arms QD rings. But, I've always been a bit nervous. If you were to push that lever a tad, would the tension on the mount change slightly? Would that explain slight changes in zero (or ammo batches, shooter, wind etc). As a side note, the 2-7 scope has never wandered an it is in solid Ruger brand mounts not QD. That or the higher magnification might explain why it groups more consistently.
My personal plan is to mount my Trijicon solid, no QD mounts. I'll throw a small screwdriver in my hunting bag (the one that carries my hunting license etc, and never gets left). If the scope fails I'll switch to irons. My idea is that the solid mount will eliminate a potential source of error. If the new scope wonders I will know its not the mounts. Now having said all that, those QD rings generally work, I'm just a perfectionist. If you want a backup scope by all means put it in QD rings. It will be good enough if you aren't shooting at extreme range. The Alaska Arms rings are solid, maybe a bit more beefy than some other designs. I believe they make rings for the CZ.
Hope that helps. I might be selling my 1-4 Leopold. If you are interested PM me. I think I like the Trijicon better but the Leopold has held up within reason.
