Zambezi
AH fanatic
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2020
- Messages
- 857
- Reaction score
- 3,805
- Location
- Johannesburg / Queensland
- Hunted
- South Africa, Zimbabwe, Zambia
The following is from a talk radio station here in South Africa. I'm sure there is also a podcast of the interview.
Botswana Predator Conservation director Dr J Weldon McNutt says
The predation of livestock by carnivores, and the retaliatory killing of carnivores as a result, is a major global conservation challenge. Such human-wildlife conflicts are a key driver of large carnivore declines and the costs of coexistence are often disproportionately borne by rural communities in the global south.
While current approaches tend to focus on separating livestock from wild carnivores, for instance through fencing or lethal control, this is not always possible or desirable. Alternative and effective non-lethal tools that protect both large carnivores and livelihoods are urgently needed.
A new study describes how painting eyes on the backsides of livestock can protect them from attack.
John Perlman on Afternoon Drive speaks to Botswana Predator Conservation director Dr J Weldon McNutt for more on this.
SOURCE: https://www.702.co.za/articles/3956...le-with-eyes-painted-on-their-backsides-study
Seems as if this is a great and inexpensive way to reduce stock loss due to predation. But does it take one of the strings out of the "reason to hunt' bow? Supposing this was successful worldwide, would the antis now have another reason to say "see, we don't need hunters to cull numbers there is no more conflict anymore".... I suppose our answer will still be that there are less predators being shot by local farmers therefore their numbers will still need to be controlled.
Glad it works as predation causes untold financial damage to peasant and commercial farmers.
Botswana Predator Conservation director Dr J Weldon McNutt says
The predation of livestock by carnivores, and the retaliatory killing of carnivores as a result, is a major global conservation challenge. Such human-wildlife conflicts are a key driver of large carnivore declines and the costs of coexistence are often disproportionately borne by rural communities in the global south.
While current approaches tend to focus on separating livestock from wild carnivores, for instance through fencing or lethal control, this is not always possible or desirable. Alternative and effective non-lethal tools that protect both large carnivores and livelihoods are urgently needed.
A new study describes how painting eyes on the backsides of livestock can protect them from attack.
John Perlman on Afternoon Drive speaks to Botswana Predator Conservation director Dr J Weldon McNutt for more on this.
Fewer cows with paintings were attacked.
Dr J Weldon McNutt, Director - Botswana Predator Conservation
This will not resolve all the risks with wild animals and livestock.
Dr J Weldon McNutt, Director - Botswana Predator Conservation
We can demonstrate following this project that this decreases the risk associated with predators.
Dr J Weldon McNutt, Director - Botswana Predator Conservation
SOURCE: https://www.702.co.za/articles/3956...le-with-eyes-painted-on-their-backsides-study
Seems as if this is a great and inexpensive way to reduce stock loss due to predation. But does it take one of the strings out of the "reason to hunt' bow? Supposing this was successful worldwide, would the antis now have another reason to say "see, we don't need hunters to cull numbers there is no more conflict anymore".... I suppose our answer will still be that there are less predators being shot by local farmers therefore their numbers will still need to be controlled.
Glad it works as predation causes untold financial damage to peasant and commercial farmers.
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator: