Badboymelvin
AH fanatic
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2013
- Messages
- 511
- Reaction score
- 2,045
- Location
- Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Media
- 25
- Articles
- 2
Hey guys,
l thought I'd post a pic of my new (to me anyway) .303
Not sure if there's many fans of the old .303 British on here, but it's personally one of my absolute favourite's.
lt's a No.I MK III made in 1942 and is in good condition. The barrel is not in too bad condition and it feeds and ejects perfectly.![Thumbs Up (y) (y)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@14.0.2/assets/72x72/1f44d.png)
I paid $395 (minus the scope - that cost $60) which considering the condition it is in, was a good price.
The price of these old girls has skyrocketed... who would've thought, hey?
It's fitted with a nice aftermarket stock and fitted with a very sturdy steel bridge mount and now a Japanese Tasco 3-9x40 scope.
The finishing touch is the nice leather sling which l think really fits the part.
When I first took possession of it I bought 100 rounds of some inexpensive PPU 150gn ammo.
I excitedly drove to the range and after a couple of hours the results were extremely disappointing. Instead of shooting a group it threw a pattern!
It either didn't like this ammo or l had a clunker!
I had a suspicion it was the ammo. Not that PPU ammo is bad but the PPU uses a boat-tail bullet and was lighter at 150gn.
From what l've learned about .303's over the years, when they have a less than perfect barrel, more often than not lighter projectiles and/ or boat-tails don't shoot well in them. Well the PPU had both and I had a suspicion this might be the problem.
Next time out I was using a friend's hand-loads that utilised the Sierra 180gn projectile. I had no qualms using this ammo as it was well under max and he was a experienced hand-loader. Immediately the groups shrank and I was getting groups of around 1" at 50m.
However this ammo was very, very mild and only chronographed at 2160fps.
This was only 1865ft/lbs - well below the 2400ft/lbs the .303 is usually credited as doing, but would still be plenty for deer at reasonable ranges.
I worked out that if I zeroed it 2.5" at 100m, it would be around 4.5" low at 200m and around 12.5" at 250m- which is what l would personally consider to be the max distance l would use this load for deer hunting.
Once l have enough empties l will increase this load a bit and aim for 2450-2500fps.
So all that's left is to try it on game and see how it performs but l think it will be fine - even at this lower velocity. I've taken it out on a previous deer hunt but was unsuccessful so I've organised another one early tomorrow morning... so fingers crossed.
If I get one I'll be sure to write up a hunt report but even if l'm not successful, just being out in the bush with a piece of history will make for a great day.
Russ
l thought I'd post a pic of my new (to me anyway) .303
Not sure if there's many fans of the old .303 British on here, but it's personally one of my absolute favourite's.
lt's a No.I MK III made in 1942 and is in good condition. The barrel is not in too bad condition and it feeds and ejects perfectly.
![Thumbs Up (y) (y)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@14.0.2/assets/72x72/1f44d.png)
I paid $395 (minus the scope - that cost $60) which considering the condition it is in, was a good price.
The price of these old girls has skyrocketed... who would've thought, hey?
It's fitted with a nice aftermarket stock and fitted with a very sturdy steel bridge mount and now a Japanese Tasco 3-9x40 scope.
The finishing touch is the nice leather sling which l think really fits the part.
When I first took possession of it I bought 100 rounds of some inexpensive PPU 150gn ammo.
I excitedly drove to the range and after a couple of hours the results were extremely disappointing. Instead of shooting a group it threw a pattern!
It either didn't like this ammo or l had a clunker!
I had a suspicion it was the ammo. Not that PPU ammo is bad but the PPU uses a boat-tail bullet and was lighter at 150gn.
From what l've learned about .303's over the years, when they have a less than perfect barrel, more often than not lighter projectiles and/ or boat-tails don't shoot well in them. Well the PPU had both and I had a suspicion this might be the problem.
Next time out I was using a friend's hand-loads that utilised the Sierra 180gn projectile. I had no qualms using this ammo as it was well under max and he was a experienced hand-loader. Immediately the groups shrank and I was getting groups of around 1" at 50m.
However this ammo was very, very mild and only chronographed at 2160fps.
This was only 1865ft/lbs - well below the 2400ft/lbs the .303 is usually credited as doing, but would still be plenty for deer at reasonable ranges.
I worked out that if I zeroed it 2.5" at 100m, it would be around 4.5" low at 200m and around 12.5" at 250m- which is what l would personally consider to be the max distance l would use this load for deer hunting.
Once l have enough empties l will increase this load a bit and aim for 2450-2500fps.
So all that's left is to try it on game and see how it performs but l think it will be fine - even at this lower velocity. I've taken it out on a previous deer hunt but was unsuccessful so I've organised another one early tomorrow morning... so fingers crossed.
If I get one I'll be sure to write up a hunt report but even if l'm not successful, just being out in the bush with a piece of history will make for a great day.
Russ
Last edited by a moderator: