Hey all.
For my inaugural thread is one with two questions. I am in the market for a "heavy" rifle for my never-to-be African Safari. I currently have a Mark X .458 magnum. My second I've owned and am well set up with .458 ammo, brass, components.etc.
I have an option on a Ritterbusch double rifle. What I could find on them has all been positive. It handles and points incredibly well.
The only downside is it is in .458 magnum. I would much prefer a classic gun such as that to be in a comparable caliber, .470 or .500 etc,etc. And I can see where one could theoretically have more extraction issues. Not a huge issue to me as I won't be making an african trip where it matters, however I do not have guns that will malfunction regardless (OCD) and would be nice to be able to use my extensive ammo supply.
That said I see many doubles chambered in .375 H&H and .458, .416 Rigby,etc. And haven't found much for instances of real world problems. I would get to test-fire it and examine it closer before purchase. It was $15K and now down to 13.5K.
What's slightly pushing me to getting it is Double Rifles, especially at an affordable price are very hard to find here in Montana. And being able to handle one such as this .458 Ritterbusch makes a big difference. It handles and points nicely. I got to handle a Merkel .470 and am very glad I never got a chance to buy one sight unseen as it felt very nose heavy and didn't naturally point, for ME at least.
I was looking prior to this at a Sabatti. I have owned a .45-70 (non cabelas version) and it was very nicely fitted and regulated extremely well and pointed nice. So I had figured if I was purchasing online I would be better off with a known entity vs unknown/
SO my main question was if anyone had Ritterbusch experience, also if anyone outright had issues with .458 magnums in double rifles? Thank you all for the help.
For my inaugural thread is one with two questions. I am in the market for a "heavy" rifle for my never-to-be African Safari. I currently have a Mark X .458 magnum. My second I've owned and am well set up with .458 ammo, brass, components.etc.
I have an option on a Ritterbusch double rifle. What I could find on them has all been positive. It handles and points incredibly well.
The only downside is it is in .458 magnum. I would much prefer a classic gun such as that to be in a comparable caliber, .470 or .500 etc,etc. And I can see where one could theoretically have more extraction issues. Not a huge issue to me as I won't be making an african trip where it matters, however I do not have guns that will malfunction regardless (OCD) and would be nice to be able to use my extensive ammo supply.
That said I see many doubles chambered in .375 H&H and .458, .416 Rigby,etc. And haven't found much for instances of real world problems. I would get to test-fire it and examine it closer before purchase. It was $15K and now down to 13.5K.
What's slightly pushing me to getting it is Double Rifles, especially at an affordable price are very hard to find here in Montana. And being able to handle one such as this .458 Ritterbusch makes a big difference. It handles and points nicely. I got to handle a Merkel .470 and am very glad I never got a chance to buy one sight unseen as it felt very nose heavy and didn't naturally point, for ME at least.
I was looking prior to this at a Sabatti. I have owned a .45-70 (non cabelas version) and it was very nicely fitted and regulated extremely well and pointed nice. So I had figured if I was purchasing online I would be better off with a known entity vs unknown/
SO my main question was if anyone had Ritterbusch experience, also if anyone outright had issues with .458 magnums in double rifles? Thank you all for the help.