So I guess I'll jump in to correct a few mistakes and also give a British perspective on shooting, hunting and firearm manufacture.
Firstly.
@Major Khan . I should like it to be made known that actually, for the last 20 years, firearms ownership in the UK has remained stable.
Ref:
https://www.gov.uk/government/stati...es-england-and-wales-april-2018-to-march-2019
In fact, since 1997 or so, Firearm certificate numbers have risen year on year at a rate exceeding natural population growth over the period. I.E - not only are there more shooters now than in say 1999 in real terms, but also in percentage terms. Admittedly, this is from a low baseline level and shotgun numbers remain static, but it's fair to say that shooting in the UK in terms of actual interest in the sport remains stable, whilst hunting itself is increasingly democratised as paid excursions on the old private estates bcome more and more available (if sometimes pricy).
What has increased in recent years is a vocal 'anti-hunting / anti-shooting minority who have disproportionate influence on policy and the press over and above their true numbers. Most British citizens remain indifferent to the issue and unknowleageable about firearms and hunting, just as they have been since at least the 1980's.
Secondly - the 'class' aspect of UK shooting. There is a small minority of well heeled shooters (usually described as the 'driven grouse' crowd) in the UK. They are a combination of the remnants of the old landed classes continuing their hobby as they always have, supplemented by nouveau rich city types, plus foreign shots. I do not play in this crowd as I'm both dreadfully common and not filthy rich either, but I know a few who do. Nice chaps, on the whole.
However, whilst they get a fair amount of 'air time' in newspapers such as The Guardian as the 'stereotypical hunter' this could not be further from the truth. At a guess, I'd say less than 2,000, certainly less than 10,000 UK shots take days on driven grouse every year, out of a population of 500,000+ shotgun owners. They're no more representative of british sportsmen than say american sportsmen who've taken a couple of the Big 5 are representative.
Continuing this train of thought, I'd guess there's more Brits this year who'll buy large shot sizes in steel (3. BB etc) from Eley to take geese or ducks on the foreshore than will buy 6 shot for grouse. Of course as far as Eley is concerned, the only markets that matter are clay shooters (maybe 70% of volume) and pheasant shooters (maybe 20% of volume). Everything else is limited run, limited quantity stuff that they have to do to broaden the range but probably make no money from. Either way, I expect you could fit the entire volume of cartridges containing 3 shot or larger in a single truck. It's tiny, trivial volumes.
So that's one correction. British shooters are, not too put too fine a point on it, taking a lot more shit for their chosen hobby now than ever before, but this isn't because numbers are dwindling or public perceptions have really changed, it's just easier for militant vegan types to get media attention via twitter or facebook now than it was on paid media.
Moving on to why the British trade is dying.
Well, honestly, yeah, its market size and competition, plus a decreasing interest in 'buying British', rising costs of labour and materials, increased resticitions on export, loss of Empire markets and possibly decreased barriers to import of Euro made goods (likely not a massive factor).
The simple fact of the matter is, if you're not able to charge a significant premium for 'origin', or sell a lot of units locally, Britain isn't really a great choice for the gun industry. We can't do what the Americans do in this space, make a lot of admittedly reasonably good firearms, then slap 'MADE IN AMERICA' on them in big letters and sell them cheaply to the locals because firstly, we don't have a big local market, the locals don't really care that much if it were made there (at least not enough to pay a couple hundred quid more for a rifle) and then you're stuck trying to make up volumes selling into America and then losing to the likes of Savage.
The likes of BSA could hang on through the '50's as they were coming into the period with masses of post war infrastructure, relatively low wages verus the US, a ready made export market to the (ex)colonies and little competition from the likes of Germany which was frankly in an even worse state than we were.
Basically as soon as Europe pulled itself together, america started making inroads into places like India, Australia and all that nice 1940's vintage plant started to become obsolete or maintenance heavy, the British gun industry was screwed. Throw in rising energy costs, the loss of the last of British steel and heavy union pressure in the 60's and 70's and that was the death knell. Same story as for our automotive industry really, although that's picked up a bit in recent years through foreign investment in the likes of JLR.
Anyway, all that remains viable now is the liks of Holland who have the privileged position of being a 'name' on the international stage with a history and prestige that upcoming competitors simply cannot buy. But for the likes of BSA or a modern day 'British Remington'? Nah, doubt it.
There is a ray of hope though. Whilst not really mass market, the number of smaller bespoke and semi-custom gun smiths in the UK is really beginning to pick up in recent years. Accuracy International is one, Longthorne another, plus the likes of Boxall and Edminston and the innumerable suppliers of custom and semi-custom actions, barrels and compoinents into the competitive rifle scene. They're not 'the gun of the working class', sure, but they're an attempt to preserve some of the history and engineering know how present here at a price which is at least a bit more attainable. We continue to have a large presence in the field of shotgun cartridge production as well, with names such as Eley, Gamebore, Hull Cartridge, Lyvale possibly being familiar to at least some of you.
All in all, I wish the British gun industry well. I think the outlook today is significantly brighter today than it has been since the 1970's and as long as political pressure (make no mistake, the government really, really don't like guns here) doesn't kill everything through more bans, I think they have a reasonably bright future ahead.
Al.