Has anyone gathered experience with Zastava rifles or actions manufactured within the last 10 years?
I have seen and shot many of them. Favorite rifle on Balkans.
New ones could face a bit of lack of fit and finish, on occasion can have feeding problems, or somtimes could have a misaligned drilled and tapped screw holes, or the barrel is not necessarily always floated, due to bad inletting, or.... you can get it all perfect. But those are usual bugs, on some of new builts, and not always, but I have seen it.
Factory has worn out machinery and underpaid workforce that results in occasional quality slips as above mentioned. Some of the new ones are good ones, and some are a bit problematic, as per above.
Export samples for USA could be better then those for local market. (At least, that is local myth with local hunters at Balkans, this had never been proven)
Ali those issues are small things, nothing that an average gunsmith cannot fix. Especially if you are already taking a gunsmith service in preliminary planning.
I think the reason to buy Zastava M70 is not because it is cheap, but because it is one of the last budget built mausers 98 that can be easily debugged to reliable working condition (or even better).
This rifle is also made of wood and steel. (no plastic)
This is a quality that I dont know with other modern factory rifles. This quality appeals to all rifle conservatives like me.
You can rebarrel to 375, but check first if they have 375 already available.
If it means something, when I was buying 375 for Africa, Zastava was one of the few on my short list of options.