There are a lot of specifics - all of them bad for Ukraine and a military windfall for the Russians.
I'll list them so you can do your own research.
The US has "suspended " all military assistance including everything already deployed to Poland for transfer to Ukraine. That would include critical air defense missile systems essential for countering Russian strikes on civilian infrastructure.
The US has "suspended" all intelligence support to Ukraine. That not only affects targeting and countering Russian attacks. But that early warning has been essential to Ukraine getting civilians to shelters ahead of Russian missile strikes, and bring ADA assets to full readiness. That is going to be a lot of blood on MAGA hands.
Cyber command actions have been suspended against Russia. Though they have been carrying put extensive efforts against us since 2016.
A US delegation met two days ago with Zelensky's political opposition.
You can find all of these actions easily - even on many of the true nut job rightwing sites which praise every action against Zelensky.
Putin could not have given Trump a list of actions more helpful to his military operations against Ukraine.
This absolutely sickens me, and I have zero confidence that Trump knows what he is doing or even if he is working in my nation's national interests. Ukraine's are obviously of no interest to him.
This is a summary from Elon's AI AP.
What actions has the US taken against Ukraine since the oval office fiasco?
Since the Oval Office meeting on February 28, 2025, between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which devolved into a heated confrontation, the United States has taken several notable actions against Ukraine. This incident, often referred to as the "Oval Office fiasco," marked a significant shift in U.S.-Ukraine relations. Based on available information up to March 07, 2025, here’s a summary of the key actions:
- Pause on Military Aid: On March 3, 2025, President Trump ordered a pause on U.S. military aid shipments to Ukraine. This decision followed the contentious meeting and was framed by a White House official as a move to pressure Zelenskyy into committing to peace talks with Russia. The pause aims to ensure that U.S. aid contributes to a resolution of the conflict, reflecting Trump’s stated focus on achieving peace. Analysts suggest this could severely impact Ukraine’s battlefield capabilities within months, given its reliance on U.S.-provided advanced weaponry like ATACMS missiles.
- Review and Pause of Intelligence-Sharing: By March 5, 2025, the U.S. had also paused intelligence-sharing with Ukraine. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz indicated that the administration was "reviewing all aspects" of its intelligence relationship with Kyiv. This step further escalates pressure on Ukraine, aligning with Trump’s strategy to push Zelenskyy toward negotiations by limiting critical support, especially as the U.S. pivots toward a more conciliatory stance with Moscow.
- Diplomatic Fallout and Conditions for Re-Engagement: Post-meeting, the U.S. has conditioned further engagement—such as resuming aid or signing a minerals deal—on Zelenskyy demonstrating a willingness to negotiate peace and possibly offering a public acknowledgment or apology for the perceived disrespect during the Oval Office clash. Administration officials have suggested that the "ball is in Zelenskyy’s court," indicating a halt in peace talks and economic agreements until Ukraine adjusts its posture.
- US officials reportedly met with Ukrainian political opposition figures, however they affirmed their support for Zelensky. The context following the Oval Office clash indicates that Ukrainian opposition figures have publicly rallied behind Zelenskyy rather than opposing him. For instance, after the contentious meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, prominent Ukrainian opposition leaders like Petro Poroshenko (Zelenskyy’s main political rival and former president) and Inna Sovsun (an opposition MP) expressed unity with Zelenskyy. Poroshenko vowed to refrain from criticism, emphasizing the need for national solidarity, while Sovsun explicitly rejected calls for Zelenskyy’s resignation, arguing it would undermine democracy. This sentiment aligns with a broader trend of Ukrainian unity in the face of external pressure, as reported by sources like the Atlantic Council and BBC, which noted increased domestic support for Zelenskyy post-fiasco.
The situation remains dynamic, with European allies attempting to fill gaps and broker peace, but as of March 07, 2025, these are the primary U.S. actions taken against Ukraine following the Oval Office incident.
. Taxpayers are tired of paying for stuff that doesn't directly affect us. Too much to fix within our own borders to worry about what boils down to a border dispute.
