sestoppelman
AH ambassador
Thank you. High number Springfield.
Sure you can. I did it. 404J fits that action perfectly. Duane Weibe sells a handy booklet for tips on converting standard action 98 Mauser to 375 H&H. Requires trimming just a bit off the locking ring. No big deal. The gun is designed with plenty of strength. For forty years Ruark's PH Harry Selby used a standard action Mauser in 416 Rigby which is an even longer cartridge requiring even more metal trimmed from the ring.Ah he called back after doing more checking and is afraid of feeding issues. I have several 98 mausers. I wonder if I could build one of them into a DG rifle??
I'm not completely sure he just said there would be feeding issues. I'm still on the hunt for somebody to do the work I think I would be a great rifleSure you can. I did it. 404J fits that action perfectly. Duane Weibe sells a handy booklet for tips on converting standard action 98 Mauser to 375 H&H. Requires trimming just a bit off the locking ring. No big deal. The gun is designed with plenty of strength. For forty years Ruark's PH Harry Selby used a standard action Mauser in 416 Rigby which is an even longer cartridge requiring even more metal trimmed from the ring.
I am surprised your guy wouldn't bite converting the Springfield to 375. Wonder what the issue was? If I can make the rails on 8mm Mauser work for 404J, I'm surprised 1903's 30-06 rails won't work with 375's narrower diameter case.
Your Springfield is easily converted with just a re-barrel to .35 Whelen, also known as ‘the Poor Man’s Magnum.’ You’d have a wide range of .358” bullets to use on African game of 200, 225, 250, 275, and 300 grains. Same mag capacity as in .’06.I have an 03 springfield that has been sporterized. Id love to find somebody i could send it to and have it converted to 375 and have it refurbished. Do any of you recommend anyone?
I may get on touch with you for tips on this type of work if it comes to thatTwo gunsmiths told me building a 404 on standard action 98 Mauser wasn't possible. But of course I knew it can be done because standard action is all Jefferey had to work with when they designed the cartridge. A third gunsmith agreed to put the barrel on but would not do the feeding mods so I did it. Very time consuming tedious work. Took me more than two days ... but I'd never done anything like that before.
@jrubyI have thought of doing this with my BSA model D 1917 enfield sporter. I am a bit worried about the shoulder on the 400 whelen hence I would probably go with the 375 whelen. It would be my third 375 cal rifle so I have been dragging my feet. I really don't see the advantage over the 9.3x62 which I have two of already
@jrubyI think a 1917 or a 1914 would be better than the 1903 for a 375H&H length cartridge and they aren't that exspensive. I do realize we are talking about a 1903.
@Ontario HunterI am looking at building 375 on my late wife's grandfather's P14. The only advantage over 1903 is P14 bolt face is already opened up. Might be a bit easier to modify the P14's separate magazine box. Safety is already in the right place on the side of the receiver. I am no fan of the guppy belly so will be flattening the trigger guard for 3+1 capacity. Also definitely not a fan of cock on closing. That can be fixed but requires changing the bolt shroud and trigger. The most troublesome obstacle is getting rid of those damn rear sight ears on the receiver. Still not sure what to do with the huge hole in top of rear ring underneath military rear sight. How do I fill that? And 1917/P14 is notorious for ejector spring breaking. I understand the defective leaf spring can be replaced with a coil spring after modifying the ejector and the receiver. So, there's pluses and minuses for either action choice but I definitely prefer 1903. It is one of the smoothest, if not the smoothest, cycling ever made. And no ears to cut off. Tap it and you're ready for a scope.