Bob — BOB, very disappointed to see you writing about hot ballistic charts and screaming fps loads etc/!! I thought you were a member of the Old Guard ? and unimpressed by meaningless ballistic “data” —a believer in “bullet placement is what really matters” etc..? Yes yes, the .25-06 charts some decent numbers and it is based off a classic round - one of the greatest of ALL time (.30-06). But, it will never “be” a classic round and can’t live up to it’s DAD because there’s only one “original”. So, before we degenerate into even more meaningless marketing jargon and start sounding like Outdoor writers “selling” rifles (6.5 Needmore or .270 WSM etc..) let’s take a pause and remember our foundational/classic roots. Now, go apologize to your .35 Whelen before it’s action rusts from tears of shame...