C.W. Richter
AH legend
IF they made the 7 w/ the same case as the 300, it'd be even better. It's 2.62 in long. Same for the WBYs (the 7 is shorter than both 300s, thus the 7x300 Wildcats.)
270 vs 7RM. Kinda like 9.3x62 vs 375HH. Close but no cigar when it comes to terminal performance. The 7 and the 375 have a definite edge. I've not shot or owned a 270 but I have a 7 and 375 and have had a 9.3. Taken a lot of pg with my 7, some with the 375. In my experience the 7RM is hard to beat for pg up to eland. I've taken zebra, black and blue wildebeest, nyala, waterbuck and a host of smaller stuff with Barnes 160gr TSX ahead of 52gr of 4064, all one shot kills out to 270 yds.Actually, the .338WM, .300WM, 7mm RM, along with the .264WM and .458WM are all the same case (2.5" length) necked up or down and based on the parent .375 H and H case.
The last one is all you need! LOLThe 300 WM case is actually a bit longer and a bit more capacity than the 7mm mag or 338 WM.
View attachment 453994
View attachment 453995
View attachment 453996
View attachment 453999
If Winchester hadn’t procrastinated in the early ‘70s with producing factory ammo for the .416 Taylor (Winchester and Ruger each made prototype rifles), the .416 RM and .416 Ruger may have never come to fruition? I have a .416 Taylor and it’s a great cartridge.With the exception of the 300 I believe you are correct, dimensionally. The loaded case capacities are not the same. Esp. so w/ the longer case 300.
View attachment 453989View attachment 453990View attachment 453991View attachment 453992View attachment 453993View attachment 454000
That's the Mags; .264, 7, 300, 338, 458 (threw my DG Fav in at the end: 416 Chatfield-Taylor! Same velocity as the Rigby, Rem and way more efficient use of that case.)
Yeah that's a whole weird area even Taylor's death had mystery surrounding it they were clearly going to introduce it. But luckily a couple companies do make factory ammo if handloading isn't your thing.If Winchester hadn’t procrastinated in the early ‘70s with producing factory ammo for the .416 Taylor (Winchester and Ruger each made prototype rifles), the .416 RM and .416 Ruger may have never come to fruition? I have a .416 Taylor and it’s a great cartridge.
I do the exact the same thing. 7mm all the way!I go up to 175 grain in the 7mm rem mag for plains game at slightly lower velocities than you stated with great results. I drop down to 143 grains for southern white tails. I prefer the 7 mag!
I believe Jack O'Connor killed about everything he hunted with his .270 using 130gr. bullets? With the availability of better constructed bullets today, who knows what larger animals the 130gr. could kill efficiently?The .270 is one of my favorite rounds, although the largest animals have been mule deer. I’ve also shot a few head with the 7mag. Once again, nothing larger than a mule deer and black bear. All performed well.
I’ve only used 130gr in the .270 at ~3070 fps. I have a load for the 150gr at 2890 fps. In the 7mm Rem mag, I load a 160gr to right at 3000 fps (26” barrel). Although I wouldn’t hesitate to take larger game such as elk or kudu with either, I’d prefer the 7 mag. However, for such game my preference is a .300 or .338 mag
The 130gr Barnes TSX in the .270 is a heck of a penetrator.I believe Jack O'Connor killed about everything he hunted with his .270 using 130gr. bullets? With the availability of better constructed bullets today, who knows what larger animals the 130gr. could kill efficiently?