7mm/08 for Plains Game? Good or Bad?

Who on our forum has used the 7mm/08 in Africa? or for large game (Elk, Deer, Moose) in North America? How did it perform? What bullets did you use? and would you recommend it for African plains game up to and including Kudu, Black WB or Zebra (I will have a 375 available for anything too big). I have two identical rifles that both shoot very well and recoil is not a consideration. One is in 7mm Mag and the Other in 7mm/08. At the range recently, I found the 7mm/08 to be surprisingly accurate with 140 & 150g bullets out to 400y but have zero experience on game with it. The 7mm Mag was ballistically not that much flatter but it was with 160 and 175g bullets. I had planned on taking the 7mm but found that it does not fit well in my hard case and rather than try to stuff it in, I would have to buy a new case if I take it. The 7mm/08 is much shorter, lighter by about 3/4lb and seems to hit the tgts well. I would be using it on Springbok, Blesbok, Kudu, Zebra, Black Wildebeest and Warthog. My concern was with the larger beasts like the Wildebeest or the Zebra and maybe the Kudu. I would be using Barnes 140g TTSX or Swift 150g Scirooco's. Both shoot to same POI out to 400y so can be swapped. Hunting ranges would be from 50y out to about 300y and could go out further in some limited cases. I know the Mag is better but, I am pretty sure the 7mm/08 would do fine but wanted to ask of any collective experiences out there with the 08? Thanks.

View attachment 665356

Who on our forum has used the 7mm/08 in Africa? or for large game (Elk, Deer, Moose) in North America? How did it perform? What bullets did you use? and would you recommend it for African plains game up to and including Kudu, Black WB or Zebra (I will have a 375 available for anything too big). I have two identical rifles that both shoot very well and recoil is not a consideration. One is in 7mm Mag and the Other in 7mm/08. At the range recently, I found the 7mm/08 to be surprisingly accurate with 140 & 150g bullets out to 400y but have zero experience on game with it. The 7mm Mag was ballistically not that much flatter but it was with 160 and 175g bullets. I had planned on taking the 7mm but found that it does not fit well in my hard case and rather than try to stuff it in, I would have to buy a new case if I take it. The 7mm/08 is much shorter, lighter by about 3/4lb and seems to hit the tgts well. I would be using it on Springbok, Blesbok, Kudu, Zebra, Black Wildebeest and Warthog. My concern was with the larger beasts like the Wildebeest or the Zebra and maybe the Kudu. I would be using Barnes 140g TTSX or Swift 150g Scirooco's. Both shoot to same POI out to 400y so can be swapped. Hunting ranges would be from 50y out to about 300y and could go out further in some limited cases. I know the Mag is better but, I am pretty sure the 7mm/08 would do fine but wanted to ask of any collective experiences out there with the 08? Thanks.

View attachment 665356
I have a 7-08 but have not taken it to Africa. I did shoot a buck at 200 yards with it. The 140 grain Accubond took him just in front of the last rib, broke the next two, through the chest cavity and exited the neck on the opposite side. Obviously, I was leased with the performance. I also didn't take it to BC for.moose, but the guide there said it would have been fine.

I have killed a zebra and a kudu with a .30-06. In my opinion, the zebra is tougher than a kudu or a moose so just be very careful of shot placement, and I'd probably go with the 150 grain bullets.
 
Didn’t Ruark basically throw his 7 mm 08 off a cliff on his safari for its lack of killing power? If you have a 7 mag, you should definitely bring that instead. The 7 mm 08 is VERY similar to a 6.5 creedmore. Even with quality bullets like Barnes tsx.. why chance it? Buy another case they are dirt cheap at harbor freight…. On 2nd thought you should leave them both and just bring the 375.
Ruark never had a 7-08. The cartridge hadn't been invented before he died. The rifle that he hated for lack of killing ability was a .220 Swift.

I do think that you are probably right that the 7mm RM would be a better choice, at least Gor the zebra, though.
 
I have a 7-08 but have not taken it to Africa. I did shoot a buck at 200 yards with it. The 140 grain Accubond took him just in front of the last rib, broke the next two, through the chest cavity and exited the neck on the opposite side. Obviously, I was leased with the performance. I also didn't take it to BC for.moose, but the guide there said it would have been fine.

I have killed a zebra and a kudu with a .30-06. In my opinion, the zebra is tougher than a kudu or a moose so just be very careful of shot placement, and I'd probably go with the 150 grain bullets.
I have never shot anything big with a 7-08
But I really don’t like the cartridge
But o will be fair it could have just been my rifle
I had one years ago
Got it right before sight it in shot it enough out to 200 yds
I had a shot at a wild hog at 300 it took its leg off
140gr Winchester black box factory ammo
I don’t remember the drop the box and book says if I remember something like 9 in at 300 yds
If it would have been a deer I would not have shot but on farm land the hog not game it’s a pest.
Any way after taking it leg off we put hog dog on it got it like 5 hr and 2 trips around the swamp later
That weekend I shot it out to 300 yd
The first shot was a foot below point of aim
The next was 18
Like I said probably the gun or the ammo
But it’s the only cartridge I have drop that much at 300ys that’s not something like a 38-55 44 mag or something like that

I love the 7x57 when I have use it

I don’t know
 
Well, since bullet placement is 90% of the formula, it can work, but there are better options. For blesbok, impala, and such, it's certainly just fine. Use good bullets. For zebra, gemsbok, and eland, I'd go with something a little bigger, but only if you shoot it well. I've always thought something starting with a 3 is a better choice for PG. Pick one. .308 Win. .30-06, .300 H&H, .300 Win, .300 Wby, .300 PRC..... The .338s work well too, if you shoot them well.

That said, I'm pretty sure a .243 in the right hands would be far better than a .416 in the hands of someone who is scared of it.
 
Boddington's Safari II has a good discussion of the 7mm-08. It is what he got his daughter Brittany started on for Africa. Thinks it should handle most plains game but wouldn't use on it on eland. He likes the 139-140 grain bullets over the 160s for the increased velocity.
 
Boddington's Safari II has a good discussion of the 7mm-08. It is what he got his daughter Brittany started on for Africa. Thinks it should handle most plains game but wouldn't use on it on eland. He likes the 139-140 grain bullets over the 160s for the increased velocity.
That all fits with what I've found. I like the 7-08, but I wouldn't choose it for eland or zebra.
 
Who on our forum has used the 7mm/08 in Africa? or for large game (Elk, Deer, Moose) in North America? How did it perform? What bullets did you use? and would you recommend it for African plains game up to and including Kudu, Black WB or Zebra (I will have a 375 available for anything too big). I have two identical rifles that both shoot very well and recoil is not a consideration. One is in 7mm Mag and the Other in 7mm/08. At the range recently, I found the 7mm/08 to be surprisingly accurate with 140 & 150g bullets out to 400y but have zero experience on game with it. The 7mm Mag was ballistically not that much flatter but it was with 160 and 175g bullets. I had planned on taking the 7mm but found that it does not fit well in my hard case and rather than try to stuff it in, I would have to buy a new case if I take it. The 7mm/08 is much shorter, lighter by about 3/4lb and seems to hit the tgts well. I would be using it on Springbok, Blesbok, Kudu, Zebra, Black Wildebeest and Warthog. My concern was with the larger beasts like the Wildebeest or the Zebra and maybe the Kudu. I would be using Barnes 140g TTSX or Swift 150g Scirooco's. Both shoot to same POI out to 400y so can be swapped. Hunting ranges would be from 50y out to about 300y and could go out further in some limited cases. I know the Mag is better but, I am pretty sure the 7mm/08 would do fine but wanted to ask of any collective experiences out there with the 08? Thanks.

View attachment 665356
Have you actually tried loading heavier bullets?

With talk about throat length and round nose bullets and the reference to it being a ballistic twin of the 7x57 I would be curious to to see how it runs with the old school bullets.

Maybe it needs a faster twist to stabilise.
I had a similar discussion recently regarding my wife’s 7x64 and my .280ai and was told the .280ai will have a shorter throat and probably better suited to the modern sleek bullets and the 7x64 and 7x57 chamber specs were old school and optimised with long round nose cup and core. That’s my summary so to speak.

So, the question is would a 7mm-08 with a long throat and fast twist be a better mousetrap than the 7x57?

I’m like the cartridge. I think it’s capable but how far are you willing to to go to get the best results.

Disclaimer, I used a hire 7mmRm in Africa. If I took a rifle I too would be torn on which of mine would be my best all rounder for the trip.
 
Thx for the advice. I would shoot Zeb with the bigger gun. They are notoriously tough. I am still on the fence with the 7/08. Others spoke of Ruark tossing one off a cliff. Actually, the 7mm/08 did exist as early as 1958 but only as a custom wildcat build. Did not become a factory load until Robet had passed. But, the rifle Ruark tossed was the 220 swift. It is a glorified varmint rifle and IMO, not well suited for larger game. Plus the bullets of Ruarks era were mostly cup and core type which were bad to frag on tougher, thick skinned game or bone which could lead to lost game or long stalks.

When I think of a 7mm/08, I think it is just a 308 that is slightly necked down and slightly faster than the 308 parent round. One of my buddies loves to Safari with a 308 using 120g loads but he is a little twisted, lol. I love to use it with the 180g pills. Still the 308 with 150g ammo is deadly. So, in my estimation a 7mm/08 loaded with 150g bullets which are sleeker, and have better BC and SD should be at least as effective. Just my opinion.

I like my little 7/08 but have not had the chance to use it on game and would like to do so but this is just not possible at this time of year. Mine likes the 150g ammo but I have not found any heavier and will not gear up to reload a hunting cartridge since I would never shoot volume with it. Please post your experiences with it if you have any. That helps.
My brother-in-law guides many deer hunts here in Texas and has always said clients did well with that cartridge. Of course they were just shooting deer out of a blind mind you. It is a fun discussion. I would add my usual mantra and that is that bigger is better for Africa.
 
I had a shot at a wild hog at 300 it took its leg off
140gr Winchester black box factory ammo
I don’t remember the drop the box and book says if I remember something like 9 in at 300 yds

That weekend I shot it out to 300 yd
The first shot was a foot below point of aim
The next was 18
Like I said probably the gun or the ammo
But it’s the only cartridge I have drop that much at 300ys that’s not something like a 38-55 44 mag or something like that
Flbt - Thank you for your inputs. With respect, I would like to offer a couple of suggestions which may or may not be of help with your 7/08. I would do these more or less in this order:
  • Try a different ammo source. In my experience, Winchester has gotten a bit sloppy with their factory ammo in recent years and I have not had much luck with it in most calibers. If your are shooting to 2" groups at 100y you are already so handicapped that 300y shots are mostly dependent on luck instead of skill. If you are shooting 1/2" groups at 100y, you have increased your odds exponentially. Not every rifle can do this but it is important to find out early on.
  • Borrow a friend's chronograph and check the actual muzzle velocity in your rifle with your chosen ammo. It is rare for the actual MV with your rifle to be as fast as the stated MV on the box. Why? in part the test rifle bbls are often a few inches longer than most production rifles that we buy. This enables marketing minions to truthfully state higher MV numbers than real world results. Plus they often round up the numbers to make them a bit bigger. If you do not test this you are guessing on the actual drop.
  • Get a good ballistic app and use it to calculate ballistic drop. Then verify it at the range and record the results and ambient temps at that time.
  • Use the verified dope to adjust your ballistic app so it is able to predict your actual drops within an inch or so and use that data when hunting.
  • If you do not have one get a laser range finder. They are cheap and accurate now. Use it to train yourself to rapidly estimate distances in various terrain. I am good at this and still struggle to estimate within 40-50y most of the time. I was with an African PH who consistently estimated distance 50y shorter than actuals. And he is a very good trained professional.
  • Know that as distance increases the apparent range as perceived by your eyes looks closer than it actually is. Your eye will deceive you unless you train yourself. My point is if you look at targets at 200y and then 300 and 400y, the further the distance the less your eye can perceive the change. 300y and 400y look almost the same where 100 and 200y are clearly different. I think this is due to the distance between your eyes staying the same as the range increases? This makes it very easy to underestimate distance as it increases. This surprises me often when I hunt on open ranges. If I am hunting a fixed hide like with coyotes, I Laser the distance to landmarks all around me at the start before I begin calling or sitting so that I am not surprised.
  • Again if not already using one, get a decent FFP optic with a MIL dot reticle or a 2FP scope with same and learn to use it to hold over for longer shots out past 250y. Either will work but the FFP is more effective in the field at various ranges since you can hold over at any magnification and be accurate with 2FP it is only accurate at maximum magnification. Just something to consider.
Armed with this approach, for short shots out to 250y or so, if zeroed at 200y based on my Swift 150g ammo, The 7/08 out of a 22" bbl is 2 in high at 100y, dead on at 200y and 3 in low at 250y. So for any game inside that window it is a fast point and shoot with only minor adjustment in your POA.

At 300y it is 8 in low. My 140g ammo hits to the same POI out to 400y as the 150's. They do fall off fast out past 250y and if you are off in your distance calcs or fail to adjust the ballistic calcs for ambient temps and elevations it is really easy to miss a shot. Usually, if a game animal is out past 300y or so, it is not going to be very aware of you unless you are being careless. Take the time to glass the prey, range the distance and calculate the correct hold over (or dial if you are confident doing so) and then decide if you want to stalk closer or send the shot. I am able to consistently hit a 6" steel plate with my 7/08 at 400y but it is dropping about 23" at that range. It sounds like a lot but with my 1-8x FFP optic, it is an easy 1.6 mil hold over. Without me knowing the actual range to the tgt accurately, I could never hit it even once. I will grant that my rifle is very accurate but even a 1 MOA rifle can do this to a degree.

The pic below is at my 200/300/400y range. I marked the 200y berm on the right, the 300y berm on the left and the 400y berm is in the middle. 100y is not marked but is approximately the little ditch in the foreground. It is deceiving. BTW, I was shooting the steel plates at 400y with my 22lr that day. It is great practice for later using centerfires at ELR's.
400y DeZarn.jpg
 
Well, since bullet placement is 90% of the formula, it can work, but there are better options. For blesbok, impala, and such, it's certainly just fine. Use good bullets. For zebra, gemsbok, and eland, I'd go with something a little bigger, but only if you shoot it well. I've always thought something starting with a 3 is a better choice for PG. Pick one. .308 Win. .30-06, .300 H&H, .300 Win, .300 Wby, .300 PRC..... The .338s work well too, if you shoot them well.

That said, I'm pretty sure a .243 in the right hands would be far better than a .416 in the hands of someone who is scared of it.
Well said Sir. On my first Safari the PH advised me not to bring my 270 for use on PG as my smaller rifle of the pair. So, I brought a 308 with 180g bonded bullets. It performed magnificently. But for reasons previously stated in the OP, I have ruled out taking the 308 this time. After hunting with me and observing my approach to marksmanship and performance off of sticks, the same PH said he was OK with me bringing the 270 or my 243 for PG this year. But, the owner of the reserve in Free State where we may have to shoot past 200y requires 270 or larger. In testing my old 270 Mauser for the trip, it just does not like the heavy bullets and was only accurate enough with the lighter 130g ammo which I do not want to rely on for Kudu or Zebra. So, with it out of the picture, I was looking at 30-06, 7mm Mag and most recently the 7mm/08. All are equally accurate and I am not recoil sensitive. But...

To restate a few issues - I like the scopes on the two 7mm's best and I like the shorter, handier nature of the 7mm/08 in the field. It is a sweet rifle. And finally, my 7mm Mag does not fit my hard case as it is about an inch too long. I am waffling back and forth and still have a month or two to decide. Swapping scopes and buying bigger cases are still viable options but none of those change the handy, fast, ease of use of the little 7/08. I like it a lot. I like the 30-06 rifle almost as well. And I like the long ass 7mag the least. Because the bbl is sooooo long. I can make it work but since I have time, I am flirting with the options. I know that pound for pound both the 30-06 and the 7mm Mag are more efficient killers of large game. I still think the 7/08 is as efficient as the 308 or very very close and for me that is good enough. In fact at longer ranges I think it might be better. So far, I have not heard any scary failure stories about the 7mm/08. The old "Use enough gun" adage rings true here. If all of them is enough, then the bigger ones are more than enough. I am estimating that the 7mm/08 is enough for all of my PG list except the Zebra and maybe the Kudu. For Kudu, I plan to use the 375HH since that hunt will not require super long shots. For Zeb I plan the same unless I get a good chance at one in Free State where I might need to go long. Off sticks I am not yet confident with the 375 past 200y. But, I think we can stalk Zebra to within that range if we are careful. Blesbok will be 300y or more and so will Springbok and Blk WB unless we get lucky. Thx for the inputs.
 
Flbt - Thank you for your inputs. With respect, I would like to offer a couple of suggestions which may or may not be of help with your 7/08. I would do these more or less in this order:
  • Try a different ammo source. In my experience, Winchester has gotten a bit sloppy with their factory ammo in recent years and I have not had much luck with it in most calibers. If your are shooting to 2" groups at 100y you are already so handicapped that 300y shots are mostly dependent on luck instead of skill. If you are shooting 1/2" groups at 100y, you have increased your odds exponentially. Not every rifle can do this but it is important to find out early on.
  • Borrow a friend's chronograph and check the actual muzzle velocity in your rifle with your chosen ammo. It is rare for the actual MV with your rifle to be as fast as the stated MV on the box. Why? in part the test rifle bbls are often a few inches longer than most production rifles that we buy. This enables marketing minions to truthfully state higher MV numbers than real world results. Plus they often round up the numbers to make them a bit bigger. If you do not test this you are guessing on the actual drop.
  • Get a good ballistic app and use it to calculate ballistic drop. Then verify it at the range and record the results and ambient temps at that time.
  • Use the verified dope to adjust your ballistic app so it is able to predict your actual drops within an inch or so and use that data when hunting.
  • If you do not have one get a laser range finder. They are cheap and accurate now. Use it to train yourself to rapidly estimate distances in various terrain. I am good at this and still struggle to estimate within 40-50y most of the time. I was with an African PH who consistently estimated distance 50y shorter than actuals. And he is a very good trained professional.
  • Know that as distance increases the apparent range as perceived by your eyes looks closer than it actually is. Your eye will deceive you unless you train yourself. My point is if you look at targets at 200y and then 300 and 400y, the further the distance the less your eye can perceive the change. 300y and 400y look almost the same where 100 and 200y are clearly different. I think this is due to the distance between your eyes staying the same as the range increases? This makes it very easy to underestimate distance as it increases. This surprises me often when I hunt on open ranges. If I am hunting a fixed hide like with coyotes, I Laser the distance to landmarks all around me at the start before I begin calling or sitting so that I am not surprised.
  • Again if not already using one, get a decent FFP optic with a MIL dot reticle or a 2FP scope with same and learn to use it to hold over for longer shots out past 250y. Either will work but the FFP is more effective in the field at various ranges since you can hold over at any magnification and be accurate with 2FP it is only accurate at maximum magnification. Just something to consider.
Armed with this approach, for short shots out to 250y or so, if zeroed at 200y based on my Swift 150g ammo, The 7/08 out of a 22" bbl is 2 in high at 100y, dead on at 200y and 3 in low at 250y. So for any game inside that window it is a fast point and shoot with only minor adjustment in your POA.

At 300y it is 8 in low. My 140g ammo hits to the same POI out to 400y as the 150's. They do fall off fast out past 250y and if you are off in your distance calcs or fail to adjust the ballistic calcs for ambient temps and elevations it is really easy to miss a shot. Usually, if a game animal is out past 300y or so, it is not going to be very aware of you unless you are being careless. Take the time to glass the prey, range the distance and calculate the correct hold over (or dial if you are confident doing so) and then decide if you want to stalk closer or send the shot. I am able to consistently hit a 6" steel plate with my 7/08 at 400y but it is dropping about 23" at that range. It sounds like a lot but with my 1-8x FFP optic, it is an easy 1.6 mil hold over. Without me knowing the actual range to the tgt accurately, I could never hit it even once. I will grant that my rifle is very accurate but even a 1 MOA rifle can do this to a degree.

The pic below is at my 200/300/400y range. I marked the 200y berm on the right, the 300y berm on the left and the 400y berm is in the middle. 100y is not marked but is approximately the little ditch in the foreground. It is deceiving. BTW, I was shooting the steel plates at 400y with my 22lr that day. It is great practice for later using centerfires at ELR's.View attachment 666111
Thanks
But that was a long time ago some where between 10-14 years ago.
I just traided the rifle back in on something else. I usto try different cartridge a lot
The win ammo was the only 7-08 ammo within 45 miles of home only one gun shop had it
Not a very popular cal around here I guess.
I knew the range in that field from the stand in it 300 was max
Been hunting that field for 40+ years
Now for the most part I am sticking with what I know for most of my hunting.

Unless something interesting and cheap enough just comes up lol
 
Ballistically it is superior to its Mauser competitor that is arguably the most deadly caliber in Southern Africa. I’ve used the Mauser and have hunted hundreds of animals in SA without feeling under gunned. After reading more into the caliber I would absolutely take the rifle.
 
I have taken 2 mule deer with 140 ELD bullets, they work. On another thread they talked about a short throat and not handling heavier bullets. I would think the short action and magazine would hinder lengthening the throat for heavier bullets. But good bullets, shot placement and reasonable ranges should make everything work out. over all I like the 7mm-08 but it is not an all around cartridge IMO.
 
The problem with the heavier/longer bullets and the short throat is that the bullet will want to be seated deeper which occupies space the powder wants. At least that was true for me. The 150 was excellent but the 175 I was never satisfied with-in my rifle.
 
The problem with the heavier/longer bullets and the short throat is that the bullet will want to be seated deeper which occupies space the powder wants. At least that was true for me. The 150 was excellent but the 175 I was never satisfied with-in my rifle.
I found a similar issue with my 7-08 Rem Model 7. The throat was plenty long enough for any bullet I would want to use in it, but the magazine box is too short to allow the heavier bullets to be seated out to where I would want them. I'd actually like to seat the 140 grain bullets further out too but again the box is too short. It works well as a deer rifle though.
 
My first trip to Namibia the, outfitter suggested 300 magnums as a minimum. I took my 300 H&H. A 330 Dakota, 2-338 Win Mags, and 2-375 H&H's rounded out the group's rifles.
My second trip to Zambia, buffalo was included, so 404 Jeffery and 375 H&H tagged along.
If I go back again for some plains game, I want to take a 338-06.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
59,204
Messages
1,281,563
Members
107,149
Latest member
Cortez4947
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

ghay wrote on Buckums's profile.
I saw you were looking for some Swift A-Frames for your 9.3. I just bought a bulk supply of them in the 285g. version. If Toby's are gone, I could let 100 go for $200 shipped you are interested.
Thanks,
Gary
Ferhipo wrote on Bowhuntr64's profile.
I am really fan of you
Bighorn191 wrote on Mtn_Infantry's profile.
Booked with Harold Grinde - Gana River - they sure kill some good ones - who'd you get set up with?
85lc wrote on wvfred's profile.
Fred,
If youhave not sold your 11.2x72 Schuler, I will take it.
Just PM me.
Roy Beeson
HI all, here is a Short update on our America trip, I currently in Houston and have 2 more meetings here before movings North toward Oklahoma, Missouri and Iowa, and from there I will head to Colorado and Idaho,I have been met with great hospitality and friendship, and have met several new and old clients and we are going to book the rest of 2025 season quick and have several dates booked for 2026!
 
Top