sestoppelman
AH ambassador
They cut throats long on CIP specs. I don't remember what the chamber length actually was on the 2 CZ's I had but mag box was long also so I just seated them out, or "sear" (ed) them out as they say Down Under.
SestoppelmanHey Aussie cowboy! You gonna cook them bullets or shoot 'em?!
SessWell maybe if you soakeminsider for a while they might soften up some..
@Bob Nelson 35Whelen ,
I have plenty of room to the lands and also mag length, but the neck of the 9.3 case is pretty short. I'm already stretched a bit.
@Newboomer ,
Thanks. I'll keep for reference when I source some 250 TSX (FB) bullets.
Is your 4064 the "IMR" variety? And do you happen to know the decapped weight of your Hornady brass? The Lapua brass weighs around 95 grains, so possibly less internal volume.
FWIW, the Nosler Max load with IMR4064 is 56.0 grains with 250s. Same for the Swift manual. Both are probably on the safe side to allow for older rifles.
Welcome Ray!Im getting proper velocity for the bullets in question, I have worked up hotter loads as you suggest, but considering African heat, and bullet construction I prefer to stay just a tad South of max in big bores. If I feel the need for more velocity then I would use the 93x64 or 375 H&H or Ruger. The 63 gr. load in my 9.3x62 was a sticky bolt and a extractor mark,
My selected loads for my particular guns consist of the 320 gr. Woodleigh, the 286 Nosler, and the 250 barnes TSX, with 60 grs. of RL-17 for 2400 fps, 2550 fps and 250 gr BArnes TSX is the exception with 62 grs. of RL-15 for 2577 fps..Ive found that RL-15 is a excellent powder in the 9.3x62 as well, I get about 75 FPS more with RL-17, hardly worth the trouble, so I would let accuracy make my decision..In my case RL-17 won by a hair..
Does anyone know if Ray is still around? Haven't seen anything from him in awhile.After all these years, I ran across a used 375 Ruger Hawkeye and Ive been playing with it, its the early light weight at 7.5 lbs naked, and 8.5 with a 3X Leupold...Extremely accurate rifle with every load Ive tried and all loads to the same POI, that's the kind of gun I like and usually keep...Im really impressed with the caliber, and it beats my Holland by 100 plus fps with all bullet weights, recoil is there for sure due to the weight...Hard to compare it to my 9.3x62 but other than recoil, it surpases the 9.3x62..but "other than recoil" is a big plus for the 9.3x62..then again I have lost of room to cut back to the accepted 300 gr. at 2500 FPS, a load that has proven buffalo worthy for me over the last 40 or so years. I like this Ruger.
Good to hear. I enjoy his writings.Yea, he's still around. He pops up occasionally over on another forum.