This is, I agree, a great series. Have watched both episodes. They were clearly created, however, with something like NatGeo as the eventual channel. Stylistically rather like "River Monsters" and it's ilk. Nothing wrong with that, and certainly nothing wrong with broadening the appeal of an investment to a larger audience. It is particularly good to shine a light on the good work being done by the all too view park rangers, vets, and security teams trying to hold the line against poachers.
I wish that he could find a means to work the positive role of hunting into the conservation/preservation effort. The main message an uniformed viewer could take from the first two episodes is that if an animal steps out of the protection of Kruger, it's toast. Which is partially true except for the neighboring conservancies which are working pretty hard to preserve and grow their own game populations. This is particularly true of the rhino.
Again, an uninformed viewer could pretty easily draw the inference that hunting and poaching are pretty much the same thing. And I, no doubt, am becoming over sensitive with regard to my sport. And to Ivan's credit he does identify himself as a "hunter" at the start of each episode.
I wish that he could find a means to work the positive role of hunting into the conservation/preservation effort. The main message an uniformed viewer could take from the first two episodes is that if an animal steps out of the protection of Kruger, it's toast. Which is partially true except for the neighboring conservancies which are working pretty hard to preserve and grow their own game populations. This is particularly true of the rhino.
Again, an uninformed viewer could pretty easily draw the inference that hunting and poaching are pretty much the same thing. And I, no doubt, am becoming over sensitive with regard to my sport. And to Ivan's credit he does identify himself as a "hunter" at the start of each episode.
Last edited: