I stand corrected. I apologize and appreciate you letting me know my wrong doings.
It is like I said, "In every discussion or debate, you are either for it or against?" I feel that if the 8mm Rem Mag was given the chance of popularity, that of the .300, 338, etc. Remington just only made a few of them for 7 years. Who knows what it could have been? So, there is no telling what kind of rifle it could have been. Because the biggest complaint people had was the terrible 41 lb recoil. Their were no muzzle breaks back then. Like even now, it claimed that bigger will out do the smaller?
The 8mm Rem Mag is only 5% smaller than the 338 Lapua Magnum. I have enclosed the pics to back up the reference from Wikipedia. Oh, I will close with this. I feel that back in 1986, a gallon of gas was $0.91, average new car was $7,651, and new 8mm rem mag rifle was $275 with box ammo $20.00. Now ammo is $125 and rifle is $1300 and the Lapua Magnum is $3000.00 and up?