I absolutely agree on the E-Type.
I will also second the motion on the wonder of Jaguar engines. My experience is with the V-12, not the 6, but I do enjoy it.
I am also surprised by the reliability of my Rover. It has really been wonderful.
That said, the thing to keep in mind with both Jaguars and Land Rovers is the problems that were brought by poor financially driven engineering decisions made by British Leyland. But that's a different rant entirely.
I will disagree regarding the form of the 911. Don't get me wrong, I love classic 911s. I've owned/driven several. But their form was remarkable in that it was completely driven by function. The hood line was as low as possible to reduce windage, but the headlights needed to be that high. That "bathtub" rear end was exactly right to cover the rear engine. Completely function driven. Even the "Tea-Tray" whale tail used on the 930 was required by the height of the intercooler.
As far as airplanes go, yes, the Tomcat does look wonderful. And the story of why Iran bought the Tomcat and not the Eagle is also interesting... and has a lot to do with the difference between Air Force pilots and Naval Aviators. But when it comes to airplanes (and speaking of form following function), well:
View attachment 601178