To the contrary, they are durable, easily reconditioned and repaired, and I've seen many beautiful examples like this with plenty of honest wear, yet well cared and attended.
At least 50% of the Griffin & Howe rifles in this style have been on many, many hunts.
This is the problem that most people misunderstand today about best guns. A best gun is made of walnut and has an oil finish. An equal price plastic gun does not. At the end of the season with a best gun, a drop of oil applied and rubbed into the stock until warm, perhaps done 2-3x over a week, will rebuild all finish and conceal many scratches. You cannot do that with plastic and polyurethane. An oil finish breathes, that big old dent you put into it can be steamed out immediately if you want, or with slightly less efficacy, once every 5-10 years during a light servicing by a professional. I cannot fix gouged plastic. As a plastic gun ages, it looks bad, as a best gun ages it burnishes and gets more character. One, wear is bad, the other, wear is good.
And the price of that gun in the picture? No way to tell without more info, but I've seen guns of that quality go for under $4000, less than most of the junk on the rack at the gunstore chain that sells "premium mass produced rifles". (this assuming its in a common caliber like 30-06 or 270 where there is a lot of supply) And in a decade, what's the gun above worth? What you paid or better. And the plastic alternative? $1500 seems to buy any plastic used gun with a $1200 optic attached if you go looking for that guy that went on a sheep hunt once and doesn't want it anymore.
Life is way to short to own and shoot junk. I wish we did a contest for a magazine. Two guys get $5000 and have to buy a 3 gun battery. One guy will buy 3 Rem 700s that will be half value in 3 years, another guy could buy one best gun and two high-grades of vintage quality. Every time these scenarios come up, the guy with the plastic says "I didn't know that was even possible". Hunters can be unimaginative at times.