THE Red Duiker
So as I mentioned in previous post on my first Red Duiker, there were even better. And in fact, this next one was taken prior to the one I previously posted about.
We were once again on the hunt for buff and making our way down one of the dirt paths when I said to Donna, hey there's something over there to our left and in front of us down in the bush about 100 yards away. The sun was beaming off the side of the animal, but there was enough bush in the way that I wasn't sure if it was a Red Duiker or the sun reflecting off the darker side of the hair of an impala.
Jaco had seen it too and slowed down, but as I thought he about to stop, he continued on and I didn't immediately get my binoculars on him. Jaco pulled a little further forward to where we could get a better look at the ram.
A brief pause to discuss optics. I have expressed my opinion on rifle scopes here on AH numerous times. I definitely appreciate the superior optics of Swarovski, S&B and Leica, but I put a priority on reliability. I made the switch over to Nikon scopes some years back. The reason being they just never seem to break, even on my bigger bores. Superior optical quality is second place in my mind to superior reliability, and in my experiences Nikon offers the latter.
But binoculars are a different story. I have and you most certainly can use mid-range binoculars and/or spotting scopes, but you are giving something up. And where that is can sometimes be hard to measure. But where I see it is in how quickly and easily small details become clearer. Your brain has a way of knowing what it is looking for and will kind of "argue" with your eyes with lesser quality glass to resolve things and eventually you get more/less what you're looking for.
This can really be experienced when hunting animals like Coues deer where you do a lot glassing. With superior optics, it is easier to pick out the details, that is it is easier on your brain. Spend a whole day glassing for Coues deer with less optics and you'll likely end up with a headache by the end of the day, at least that's what I've experienced.
So a couple of years ago I picked up my first pair of Swarovski binoculars. This was when the NL models came out and there were very good prices on the EL versions. Great bins for sure and this would've been what I used. But then
@dogcat1 put some Leica Geovids up for sale including a pair with the range finding feature, and the price was impossible to beat. I bought a pair of these and let Donna use the Swaros.
This came into play on this Red Duiker. As Jaco stopped the truck I popped up the Leica's and with a quick focus, the horns on the animal were quickly distinguishable. I mean like instantly. This was one of those few times you realize immediately that there's no point in spending anymore time evaluating the animal. You just know right now that you're looking at one to take.
Jaco must've agreed as he was getting out of the truck as I jumped up to grab my rifle. Off the truck we went and made a short stalk to get within 75 yards of the ram.
Now there was a troop of yellow baboons in the trees by the ram and they started to get nervous and head out. I was afraid they would take the ram with them and in fact one baboons launch from a tree spooked the ram just a little bit but he went back to feeding in short order.
I had loaded up some North Fork flat point solids for moments like this and had one in the chamber. I took the short and while I didn't see the ram fall behind the dead tree that was in front of him I could tell by everyone's reaction that he was down.
In short order I was to lay my hands on this ram. So doing and at the risk of sounding boastful, I was certain we had a pretty special trophy here. I don't mean to seem boastful at all, God smiled on me that day and provided an opportunity at this ram that anyone else could've received.
If you're wondering, the ram was measured. I normally don't get too excited about measuring animals. I have had some measured and several would've made the SCI silver or gold ratings, but I've never submitted them. I just don't worry about that sort of thing too much. But this one was different and I believe is worth pursuing further.
So what did it score? I'm withholding that information for now. Measuring them is a simple thing to do. Measure the length of each horn and the circumference of each base. Add up those four measurements and you have your total. So it's kind difficult to not do an accurate measurement, but still I'd prefer to have an official measurement made before I publish the number.
View attachment IMG_0136.jpeg
View attachment IMG_0137.jpeg