One for Franz! The 470 Capstick!

I like to know that it could go or what’s the point right?
Yes, correct.......

So these are PacNor bbls on our 470’s?
No, I don't think so, PacNor provided the barrel I had on my 475 B&M that was oversized.
I don't know where Winchester Custom shop bought those barrels for the Big 5 Series. And the Custom shop was long closed by the time i learned this.

Do you think you’ll ever start messing around with your 470’s again?
No, that is for sure, I sold both of them, with 100% full disclosure to the buyers that the barrels were oversized, I could not do otherwise. But it did not matter to either.

I even put my 475 B&Ms to the side, 3 of them..... they are fine, but I do not support them and always steer those folks to 458........

But we damn sure made up some good bullets because of the B&M version, from CEB and North Fork.....
 
Early days I knew Leslie Dengler at the Winchester Custom Shop pretty well. I had several Custom Shop rifles, and got in on the Big 5 Series a tad late, but near perfect timing for me.... I missed the 375 which is just as well, since I would have had no use for such....... I got in late on the #50 Series and the #97 Series that was still available, 338 WInchester, 416 Remington, 458 Winchester, and the last one the 470 Capsticks....... Speculation was that it would be 458 Lott for sure, the 470s really was not expected.........

Right from the start, neither #50 or #97 would retain cartridges in the magazine, load 3 down, work the bolt and one would pop out. I did some load development, was actively shooting both guns, but retaining was an issue. I called Leslie and had a little pow wow........ She said no one else was having that issue? I told her duh Leslie, do you really think other people are shooting them or making Safe Queens out of them? Anyway, Leslie asked me to send them up to her with some dummy rounds and they would try to get them to retain. She also stated that she was not confident in the results, they had gunsmiths, but they weren't of top tier quality, good guys, I spoke to some of them, but the experience with such things was just not up to par............... A few phone calls, and a few weeks later they thought they had solved the issue and sent them back.

Lo and Behold, both guns worked as the should...... for about 20-25 rounds each, and the retaining issue started again. Leslie did not have the expertise to sort it out. I think the 470 was just a tad bit thicker in body than the 458 Lott and it was just enough to cause a problem..............

Life went on....... shortly after 2005 I had hooked up pretty tight with Brian Alberts and JD Jones of SSK Industries. I learned that Brian was indeed "The Man", Brian could sort out nearly anything with a big bore rifle! I told him about the 470s and sent both up to him. While I had them there, I had him chop those long 24 inch tubes down to 21" and 22"....... put a serious SSK Blue on them, add NECG Barrel Band front sight and removed the rear completely. I used a scope on one, and XS Ghost Ring on the other...... The guns really lookded great to me at this point...............

#97 with 22 inch barrel.....................

DSCN3734-X3.jpg


DSCN3753-X2.jpg


DSCN3748-XL.jpg


DSCN3760-X2.jpg


#50 with 21 inch barrel...........

DSCN3707-X2.jpg


DSCN3723-X2.jpg


When I received these back from Brian at SSK, they did indeed retain cartridges in the magazine, regardless of how hard you worked the bolt and also retained during firing....... Problem Solved, or so I thought...............

With the retaining issue sorted out, I had it in mind to take these to Africa for a workout..... so I started doing some test work with bullets available at the time........

I was not having any good luck with this..............and I started noticing that there was no engraving on many of the bullets tested for terminals........?????

DSC06325-L.jpg


Just some light markings, but no engraving..........

DSC06326-L.jpg


DSC06337-L.jpg


DSC06339-L.jpg


Amazing enough both guns were shooting one hole groups at 50 yards, so before terminals I never gave the bores a thought. I never fired one past 50 yards however. I started measuring .474 caliber bullets, and found that most were .472 to .473, the only true .474 caliber bullet I measured was from North Fork......... and of course later the CEB versions.......

I put the 470 Capsticks away for a few years at this point.

When my test partner Sam Rose and I started working on various bullet designs, we slugged those two Winchesters and both came out to .477 caliber. All I can figure is that when Winchester Custom Shop ordered those barrels they got all the wrong size. My guess is, that all 125 rifles had the same barrels, it would not make sense that only mine, #50 and #97 would have oversize barrels and the rest would be .474......... I doubt it to be honest.

But in addition to the issues, we did learn something extremely valuable out of this......... Take note of just how good the Barnes Banded Solid penetrated, WITH NO ENGRAVING........... this bullet with its 65% Meplat penetrated dead straight to 57 inches and 60 inches before becoming unstable! This is quite a testament to Meplat being very important to stability! Basically "Self Stabilizing" itself for terminal straight line performance, for most of its journey.

My BAD LUCK with .474 caliber would not end with the Capsticks.......... One of the last B&Ms to be developed was the 475 B&M (.474 caliber).......... The first gun was a high polish blue 18 inch Winchester M70, and I used it for all the load development, pressure work, and Terminal performance of the new CEB and North Fork bullets we developed in .474 true.........

The second rifle was stainless 18 inch gun, with beautiful Bastogne AI Stock....... I took it to Australia to shoot buffalo in 2012 I believe........ I took one of my most favorite Aussie buffalo with it, using a 425 North Fork Expanding CPS....... bullet exited broadside heart shot.......

DSC00457-XL.jpg


I shot several more buffalo with the CEB Solids and Raptors, and North Forks, no issues, until I recovered a 420 Raptor that had gone about 4 ft in depth on a Redskin and the base had ZERO ENGRAVING on it????? No other bullets were recovered, and as far as I could tell all the CEB and North Forks had penetrated dead straight............... When I returned home I sent the rifle to Brian at SSK, and it was an oversized barrel from PacNor........ they put a new barrel on at no cost. But that was the end of me and .474 caliber rifles, I never allowed another 475 B&M to be built, and I own the 3 that were built.......

I just had bad luck with .474 caliber or supposed to be .474 caliber rifles..............

And that is "The Rest of the Story"............
@michael458, I appreciate your information on the .470 Capstick. Your big bore experiments and development work is very interesting and useful engineering, like all other work. I have read in other articles of problems with some .470 Capstick Winchester rifles. Good explanation.

Regarding the out of spec barrel bore/rifling, I'm a bit surprised that an expensive rifle, then a barrel from a known maker is oversized, by several thousandths, enough to reduce/eliminate to rifling engraving. Have to wonder if the tool cutter for rifling supplied more than one vendor an out of spec tool. In manufacturing, these things happen if no one is paying attention.

The number #50 Winchester, the SSK bluing looks nice, and the XS sights aperture on the Weaver base just looks great.
 
The number #50 Winchester, the SSK bluing looks nice, and the XS sights aperture on the Weaver base just looks great.
This was a decent option for irons and could be removed for scope, or, scope the gun, carry the irons as a backup...... Not perfect, but decent option..... I always look for sight options...... today that has become very difficult since I have lost a portion of my vision in the right eye and just cannot learn to shoot rifles left handed...... big issue here.

DSCN3708-X2.jpg


Brian could put a high polish blue on that would have been similar to the old 1960 Colt Bluing,

Regarding the out of spec barrel bore/rifling, I'm a bit surprised that an expensive rifle, then a barrel from a known maker is oversized, by several thousandths,
One of the mysteries of our times........ I don't know either, there have always been some issues with .474 +, there was a 475 NE that ran from .474 to .483, a 475 No 2 and 475 Jeffery #2 that was up to .489......a 476 NE that was .476 and 476 Westly Richards at .476........... All I can think is somewhere there was some confusion between the Custom Shop and barrel order, and perhaps was not even specified...... The Custom Shop had absolutely zero experience with 470 Capstick, personally I think they should have done 458 Lott for that part of the series.

And just an observation, The .474 caliber did fine on buffalo, but I could not see any difference between .458 and .474 in buffalo reactions to taking the hit. My opinion you did not gain anything over .458 caliber. Equal from what I observed on 10-12 buffalo. That changes when you go to .500--.510 caliber, there is a difference. About like going from .416 to .458........

I sold all those guns I regret that at times, but now not so much, I can't shoot all the big bores I have anyway.......
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The .470 Capstick seems to be similar to the person it was named after - full of intrigue, mystery, and a bit of controversy!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
60,358
Messages
1,315,113
Members
110,938
Latest member
EulahCarpe
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Blue Iris wrote on Kuduhntr's profile.
How did your hunt with alaksandar Sasha Balancic go ??
Golden wildebeest on trigger cam!
 
Top