That is what I thought. Had LBJ or Nixon been president that may have made some sort of sense. Carter - not so much.That's OK.
No, I wasn't, so please explain. Are you referring to the Lands Conservation Act?You obviously were not in Alaska then.
I have dealt with a couple Somalis who had assimilated very well and in fact were doing better than average. One instance was a woman selling furniture. She definitely had one of the best work ethics in that store and was very focused on customer service.Not at all. She's from the most liberal district in America. Literally, the only State that voted D in the 1984 Reagan/Mondale election. Nonetheless, she is the antithesis of the American dream, she encourages non-integration principles in her constituents, and is quite proud of parasitic behaviors to break the back of this country. Unfortunately, this mentality has worked out very poorly for Somalis in their native lands and in America.
While you'll meet African immigrants throughout America that moved into non-native communities, embraced America, and flourished, you do not see that very often with Somalis.
So back to the global security problem in the Gulf of Aden, the situation is the same. Whether it's average intelligence, or its a bankrupt culture, or if its a tolerance for violence, we cannot fix Somalia. Only Somalians can. In the meantime, I recommend America's interest and focus should be protecting shipping lanes and staying the heck out of their country.
I am referring to Carter designating a LOT of land as National Monuments to build cred with his enviro-groovy base. There was a lot of heavy handed federal intervention going on in disputed state/federal/private land at the time.No, I wasn't, so please explain. Are you referring to the Lands Conservation Act?
In any case, most Islamic countries have expressed their condolences, including the Yemeni Houthis and the Afghan Taliban government, so not everything is so clear. And in general, everything was clear about the religious component from the very beginning, since the terrorist attack took place on Friday (by the way, as in Paris), and even in the holy month of Ramadan. Sapienti as they say sat. As you correctly pointed out, operations under a false flag are a common thing.You make a fair point with respect to the attempt to flee. On the other hand, the target and results were not so very different than November 2015 attacks in Paris, or the May 2014 attack in Brussels, while far smaller in scale did see the perpetrator both recording his actions and trying to escape. Another somewhat similar event occurred in Tunisia in 2015 at the Bardo National Museum which was closely followed by the attack on the Port Al Kantaoui Hotel. There was also the attack on the Turkish night club in Istanbul in 2017. There are several others that are similar.
I will agree that car bombs and suicide vests have very often been the preferred tool of ISIS terrorists. But they have also used direct action to simply shoot as many people as possible. In your nation's eagerness to find a conspiracy, I would not discount the level of hatred Russia has generated in the Islamic world over the last two decades as it has crushed dissent across the Caucasus and begun to play a more active military role in the Levant. The brutality of the Wagner Group in the region has become something of legend.
I suspect that the terrorists had support within Russia. I would look very hard there before assuming they were associated with Ukraine. Besides, such an action would be one of the worst things Ukraine could do while trying to maintain steady Western support on the battlefield.
I hasten to add, conspiracies are popular in the West just as much as Russia. Here, the internet is alive with opinion that the attack was a false flag operation on the part of the FSB to allow Putin to call for general mobilization and unrestricted attacks on Ukrainian population centers. I personally believe such an atrocity is the last thing the man who promised Russia security needed well into the third year of a month-long Special Military Operation.
Now I understand. I wish you had explained the first time I asked the question. When someone says uniform and implies federal level, then my immediate conclusion is the armed forces. That made no sense to me.I am referring to Carter designating a LOT of land as National Monuments to build cred with his enviro-groovy base. There was a lot of heavy handed federal intervention going on in disputed state/federal/private land at the time.
I'm not going to stir this pot any more.
Two years ago the GOP won the House by a historically narrow margin. If they’d stuck together, they could have used that leverage to extract more policy concessions from the Democrats who control the Senate and White House. But Ms. Greene and her faction are most interested in TV hits and internet donors. And once the GOP needs Democratic votes to pass a bill in the House, that gives even more leverage to Democrats.
I also loved the obvious observation.Speaking of MTG
![]()
Opinion | Rep. Mayhem Taylor Greene — The Wall Street Journal
The Georgia Republican files to oust Speaker Johnson, saying he’s ‘in the arms of Democrats.’apple.news
From the article, echoing my sentiments in regards to House Obstruction Caucus
I should never have brought this subject up. I was a couple beers into the evening and mindlessly repeated something that sounded witty 45 years ago.Now I understand. I wish you had explained the first time I asked the question. When someone says uniform and implies federal level, then my immediate conclusion is the armed forces. That made no sense to me.
Not where I live. AK is a different story though due to logistical challenges.OK, so back to the burning question of the day. Why has gas gone up $.80/gal in the last 10 days or so?
I am quite possibly less informed about many things than you. I just observe that at any opportunity, even if you must manufacture it, you take a gratuitous slap at Trump, who happens to be the presumptive Republican candidate. Hardly the act of a Regan republican.
Yeah the whole ANCILA land giveaway was and still is BS.I am referring to Carter designating a LOT of land as National Monuments to build cred with his enviro-groovy base. There was a lot of heavy handed federal intervention going on in disputed state/federal/private land at the time.
I'm not going to stir this pot any more.
Some of it seemed justified, the native people certainly deserved something.Yeah the whole ANCILA land giveaway was and still is BS.
OK, so back to the burning question of the day. Why has gas gone up $.80/gal in the last 10 days or so?