Politics

The FBI has some great Americans working for us. It just needs straightened out.

Even the ATF has some great guys in the trenches that are not anti firearm.

Both agencies have some political hacks at the top and mid level. But they both also have some professional hard working people that would love to regain their positive reputations
 
Agree. The FBI is extremely busy protecting the homeland. From the near peer to extremist threats they are working 24/7 to keep us safe. HRT is on call 24/7 365 as the Mission Force to respond to any CT crisis in the US. Those who call for it to be abolished have either listened to too much right wing news or just plain ignorant.
This is why we need the best of the best in these agencies leadership, I don’t think we’re getting that at the moment.
 
The FBI has some great Americans working for us. It just needs straightened out.

Even the ATF has some great guys in the trenches that are not anti firearm.

Both agencies have some political hacks at the top and mid level. But they both also have some professional hard working people that would love to regain their positive reputations

While I agree to a point, I will say every organization regardless how selective has issues. It is too be expected and sorted. Its not a catastrophic implosion. For some reason a lot of Americans pick and choose blame and place it where it is convenient. We blame the FBI for poor leadership but will applaud politicians who have done way worse either morally or legally. Yes the Bureau can use some tightening up, but they are doing a pretty damn good job.
 
This is why we need the best of the best in these agencies leadership, I don’t think we’re getting that at the moment.
I agree. The problem is the best of the best will most likely not always agree with their political bosses. Appears now that is justification for being called disloyal and removed. General Chris Donahue once told me that being dishonest is being disloyal. Real leaders want real feedback. Not what they want to hear or for us to always tow the party line.
 
Part of civilian control of the military is the senate's responsibility to confirm general officer promotions. All it takes is one to object. Christopher Donahue, then a Major General commanding the 82d ABN DIV was the on scene commander closing out the evacuation in Afghanistan. You may remember the starlight image of him as the last American soldier leaving the country. Many of us thought that was a bit too contrived.

He was soon thereafter promoted to LTG and given command of XVIII ABN Corps. Around the same time information came out that he had instructed the C-17 crew flying him and the last load out to load a Toyota Hilux mounting a Soviet 23mm anti-aircraft cannon as a war trophy to be displayed at Fort Bragg - er Liberty or whatever. The vehicle was loaded, but as a result, dozens of Afghan supporters of US forces were offloaded. I know of no one who thought that was the right thing to do.

He is up for Four Star. Senator Mulin of Oklahoma has removed him from selection. I have no problem with that action.
 
I know CD and have a lot of respect for him. He was my boss for a while in Afghanistan. If he did something he should not have then by all means he gets hemmed up. No issue there. My comment was solely he would ask for feedback even if he didn't agree with it. He truly believed being dishonest was being disloyal. He did not like yes men. I feel the incoming administration will not trust senior leaders to do their jobs and take an opposing view as disloyal. We cannot expect good leaders in positions of authority if they are not empowered to do their job.
 
Last edited:
This actually explains much:
What baffles me is that there are executives (allegedly "accomplished" executives) who put this guy in that role, which he used to promptly torpedo the brand.
 
What baffles me is that there are executives (allegedly "accomplished" executives) who put this guy in that role, which he used to promptly torpedo the brand.
Sounds similar to the guy running Harley Davidson into the ground. I guess next year all Harley's are being manufactured somewhere overseas. Death knell for the brand in the US.
 
Agree. The FBI is extremely busy protecting the homeland. From the near peer to extremist threats they are working 24/7 to keep us safe. HRT is on call 24/7 365 as the Mission Force to respond to any CT crisis in the US. Those who call for it to be abolished have either listened to too much right wing news or just plain ignorant.
Having worked with the FBI in a law enforcement capacity I can say that your average agent couldn’t find their behind with both hands and a flashlight.

I do call for the abolishment of the agency, except for the lab, and I neither listen to right wing pundits nor am I ignorant. To say that the agency does not impress me is an understatement.

We need to revamp our entire criminal justice system. That includes the local agencies as well. Law enforcement is a necessary evil that needs to be kept on a very tight, and short, leash.
 
Sounds similar to the guy running Harley Davidson into the ground. I guess next year all Harley's are being manufactured somewhere overseas. Death knell for the brand in the US.

Some models not all. Production of the touring and softail models will continue in the U.S. I still don't like they're moving some offshore, but those two lines that are staying make up the bulk of the models sold.
 
I wrote a long not explaining my thoughts on issues with the FBI. Decided it wasn't worth it.

Let's just say if you can't think of any reason why the FBI seriously needs to be reformed, and at the highest levels, you're not thinking.
 
Last edited:
I’ve posted this previously so won’t get into the weeds again.

Corporations need occasional infusions of capital. Some companies like Harley Davidson survive on lines of credit and loans. Many companies do. They pay out any revenue to shareholders and then roll the remainder into capital projects. They don’t put cash in a mattress for a rainy day.

So. When they need to borrow money if they do not have a sufficient ESG score they can not borrow the money period or if they can they pay a higher interest rate. The lower the ESG % score the higher the interest rate.

So many like Harley Davidson are hurting financially so it’s either go all in on the environment and DEI or go out of business.

This is all downstream of the Davos economic forum and equity groups like Black Rock. They are forcing their will on us thru the products and services we use.

A well-known quote from Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, regarding influencing companies is: "We are forcing behaviors," which refers to BlackRock's practice of using their significant investment power to pressure companies into adopting policies and practices aligned with their desired goals, such as environmental sustainability and diversity initiatives.

So when we boycott companies. We are shooting the hostage for the terrorist.
 
I’ve posted this previously so won’t get into the weeds again.

Corporations need occasional infusions of capital. Some companies like Harley Davidson survive on lines of credit and loans. Many companies do. They pay out any revenue to shareholders and then roll the remainder into capital projects. They don’t put cash in a mattress for a rainy day.

So. When they need to borrow money if they do not have a sufficient ESG score they can not borrow the money period or if they can they pay a higher interest rate. The lower the ESG % score the higher the interest rate.

So many like Harley Davidson are hurting financially so it’s either go all in on the environment and DEI or go out of business.

This is all downstream of the Davos economic forum and equity groups like Black Rock. They are forcing their will on us thru the products and services we use.

A well-known quote from Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, regarding influencing companies is: "We are forcing behaviors," which refers to BlackRock's practice of using their significant investment power to pressure companies into adopting policies and practices aligned with their desired goals, such as environmental sustainability and diversity initiatives.

So when we boycott companies. We are shooting the hostage for the terrorist.
“We are forcing behaviors”. Sounds like a Marxist talking point. Shouldn’t Fink be focusing on profit and helping companies to grow instead of social engineering them? Guess I’m old fashioned but I get your point about not shooting the company being held hostage by the Marxist regime so to speak.
 
I’ve posted this previously so won’t get into the weeds again.

Corporations need occasional infusions of capital. Some companies like Harley Davidson survive on lines of credit and loans. Many companies do. They pay out any revenue to shareholders and then roll the remainder into capital projects. They don’t put cash in a mattress for a rainy day.

So. When they need to borrow money if they do not have a sufficient ESG score they can not borrow the money period or if they can they pay a higher interest rate. The lower the ESG % score the higher the interest rate.

So many like Harley Davidson are hurting financially so it’s either go all in on the environment and DEI or go out of business.

This is all downstream of the Davos economic forum and equity groups like Black Rock. They are forcing their will on us thru the products and services we use.

A well-known quote from Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, regarding influencing companies is: "We are forcing behaviors," which refers to BlackRock's practice of using their significant investment power to pressure companies into adopting policies and practices aligned with their desired goals, such as environmental sustainability and diversity initiatives.

So when we boycott companies. We are shooting the hostage for the terrorist.

I’ve said this before, know your investment portfolio and stay away from anything Fink and his cronies touch. They are out to destroy our way of life.
 
I’ve posted this previously so won’t get into the weeds again.

Corporations need occasional infusions of capital. Some companies like Harley Davidson survive on lines of credit and loans. Many companies do. They pay out any revenue to shareholders and then roll the remainder into capital projects. They don’t put cash in a mattress for a rainy day.

So. When they need to borrow money if they do not have a sufficient ESG score they can not borrow the money period or if they can they pay a higher interest rate. The lower the ESG % score the higher the interest rate.

So many like Harley Davidson are hurting financially so it’s either go all in on the environment and DEI or go out of business.

This is all downstream of the Davos economic forum and equity groups like Black Rock. They are forcing their will on us thru the products and services we use.

A well-known quote from Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, regarding influencing companies is: "We are forcing behaviors," which refers to BlackRock's practice of using their significant investment power to pressure companies into adopting policies and practices aligned with their desired goals, such as environmental sustainability and diversity initiatives.

So when we boycott companies. We are shooting the hostage for the terrorist.
Just thinking aloud as a layperson, one solution to limit the ESG and other b.s. you mentioned with Fink and other apparently predatory companies like his, would be through legislation to require them to fall under a fiduciary or similar law. That is they couldn’t charge a higher interest rate or deny a loan based on a company’s lack of ESG, DEI, or anything else not related to financial parameters as it could “injure” the client company’s growth and financial stability. Just a thought.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
57,958
Messages
1,243,930
Members
102,414
Latest member
qvdfb
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
(cont'd)
Rockies museum,
CM Russel museum and lewis and Clark interpretative center
Horseback riding in Summer star ranch
Charlo bison range and Garnet ghost town
Flathead lake, road to the sun and hiking in Glacier NP
and back to SLC (via Ogden and Logan)
Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
Good Morning,
I plan to visit MT next Sept.
May I ask you to give me your comments; do I forget something ? are my choices worthy ? Thank you in advance
Philippe (France)

Start in Billings, Then visit little big horn battlefield,
MT grizzly encounter,
a hot springs (do you have good spots ?)
Looking to buy a 375 H&H or .416 Rem Mag if anyone has anything they want to let go of
 
Top