Politics

[CoElkHunter]

News flash a hole you are going back.

Back to Haiti or be parachuted into Asscrackistan? His choice. LOL

 

[CoElkHunter]

This is a good start. Just think how dug in these gang bangers would be after another 4 years of lawlessness and open borders. Brought to you by Obama and Biden. Funded by the likes of Soros.

Really makes the Marxists running Boston and Massachusetts for that matter, look incredibly incompetent, clueless and a threat to their own constituents by allowing these thugs to run amok. Those arrests were in one community, in one small part of Boston. I can only imagine how many more are forthcoming.

 

[VertigoBE]

Your scenario would play out the same way. There have been 100s killed in horrific mass killings over the past couple decades, which are covered non-stop in the media, during the same time frame judicial outcomes and legislative outcomes have been overwhelming pro-gun. In the past 20 years the assault weapons ban has been allowed to expire, followed by ZERO anti-gun laws have been passed by Congress. I suppose you could count the Safer Communities Act, but it was mostly a funding bill to states and locals. But nothing even remotely approaching a ban on any firearm.

At the state level, the movement has been extraordinarily pro-gun. 29 states now are constitutional carry, many are now no state level background checks, stand your ground and castle doctrine are now the standard. Only 11 states now have a duty to retreat.

I really need to move to the US at some point…
How’s the border crossing looking like this time of year?

 

[Altitude sickness]

Vertigo, The border is still porous. But I wouldn’t wait too much longer to walk across. Better to wait for the socialist party to regain power for not only easier access but an APP on where you prefer to be flown inside the US. Given a cell phone, 5 star hotel, free food, and a monthly stipend.

Don’t go to North Carolina though. They get to file a 20 page document and wait for $750

 

[Doubleplay]

I think Trump doesn't take up the machine gun issue because he knows damn well there are more important things to handle at present..... Like immigration, which was the #1 concern of the American voters, ergo why he won both the electoral AND popular vote.

Publicly traded companies being held accountable..... You mean like face book censuring factual data during Covid and Hunter's lap top, at the behest of the executive branch? - Yeah the justice department really got ahold of that one! LOLOL

You mean the Facebook invited to inauguration ?

 

[Doubleplay]

The insurance industry has wisely decided not to do business in areas where they loose money. The government should not be allowed to interfere. Apparently BOA is no longer gun friendly, again the government should not interfere. Bring the BOA policies into the light and let people choose with their wallets on who to do business with.

Agreed but some here pick and choose according to their liking.

 

[Altitude sickness]

Please do not equate Bank of America choosing to not liking firearms. With the fact that they were handing conservatives purchase history over to some bad actors inside the federal government.

The board members of BOA not liking firearms is a far cry from tracking your gun purchases and sending their customers information to the Democrat regime.

Trump was actually far too polite to the BOA CEO for the dangerous deeds performed at the request of Obama’s team.

I’m shocked gun owners and anyone concerned with personal freedoms and privacy are so complacent and allowing BOA to still be in business let alone hand them your money.

 

[Doubleplay]

I believe that the argument is over the interpretation, not the revision of the amendment. If the courts misinterpreted the amendment, it is within their peeve to correct the

Why not revise it in the congress then?
This is a publicity stand and a dangerous path.
Even if I don’t like the way it’s written I'm a constitutionalist and don’t like executive orders trying to meddle with the interpretation be it 2,14,22 or whatever.
All the courts should do to throw it back to congress to amend.

 

[WAB]

][emoji[emoji6]]" data-quote="VertigoBE" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">

I really need to move to the US at some point…
How’s the border crossing looking like this time of year? [emoji]

Legal is good, illegal crossing has suddenly become more risky.

 

[Doubleplay]

Please do not equate Bank of America choosing to not liking firearms. With the fact that they were handing conservatives purchase history over to some bad actors inside the federal government.

The board members of BOA not liking firearms is a far cry from tracking your gun purchases and sending their customers information to the Democrat regime.

Trump was actually far too polite to the BOA CEO for the dangerous deeds performed at the request of Obama’s team.

I’m shocked gun owners and anyone concerned with personal freedoms and privacy are so complacent and allowing BOA to still be in business let alone hand them your money.

Do you have any idea what would happen to US economy if you put BOA out of business who has 70 million customers and probably half of them republicans?
I'm also very curious about your source of BOA tracking gun purchases and sending the info to Democrats and to what purpose?

 

[CoElkHunter]

I really need to move to the US at some point…
How’s the border crossing looking like this time of year?

Can you swim? If so, probably swimming across the Rio Grande from Mexico to Texas would be best. The Canadian border is too cold this time of year. Brrrr. Better hurry though because the border crossings are closing soon. LOL

 

[Doubleplay]

Can you swim? If so, probably swimming across the Rio Grande from Mexico to Texas would be best. The Canadian border is too cold this time of year. Brrrr. Better hurry though because the border crossings are closing soon. LOL

lol.
Unfortunately illegal crossings will never stop regardless who's the president.
The only time they slowed down to a trickle was during the 2008 crisis during the mortgage crisis.

 

[Altitude sickness]

Doubleplay, It wasn’t only BOA

'Alarming' surveillance: Feds asked banks to search private transactions for terms like ‘MAGA,’ ‘Trump’

EXCLUSIVE: Federal investigators asked banks to search and filter customer transactions by using terms like "MAGA" and "Trump" as part of an investigation into

judiciary.house.gov

 

[Altitude sickness]

Unfortunately there is a loophole in the legality of doing this. The government now uses all the advertising information to legally search US citizens computer footprint and breadcrumbs your data

https://www.citizensforethics.org/n...not-be-allowed-to-buy-citizens-personal-data/

Feds suggested banks search transactions for terms like 'Biden,' 'Antifa' and more after Jan 6: sources | Fox News

EXCLUSIVE: Federal investigators asked banks in January 2021 to search terms beyond “Trump" and “MAGA," including “Biden," “Kamala," “Antifa" and more, a source familiar told Fox News Digital.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Altitude sickness]

The Data Broker Loophole Explained

Just in time for the Section 702 debate, Emile Ayoub and Elizabeth Goitein of the Brennan Center for Justice have written a concise and easy to understand primer on what the data broker loophole...

www.protectprivacynow.org

Currently, the only way we can guard against this is to purchase and use the cell phone called “Unplugged” and similar programs on your laptop.

Unplugged

Your home for privacy

unplugged.com

 

[Doubleplay]

Doubleplay, It wasn’t only BOA

'Alarming' surveillance: Feds asked banks to search private transactions for terms like ‘MAGA,’ ‘Trump’

EXCLUSIVE: Federal investigators asked banks to search and filter customer transactions by using terms like "MAGA" and "Trump" as part of an investigation into

judiciary.house.gov

These are all unsubstantiated charges denied by banks.
I'm not denying They might’ve happened but it’s not in the job description of executive branch to scold them publicly which can cause harm to shareholders.
We have judicial branch for that.
Trump is making a mistake trying to act judge, jury and executioner and it can cause irrevocable harm.

 

[Altitude sickness]

if you believe that they are only accusations. That is fine. Your world is much easier to live in.

But trust me. It Is happening. And unfortunately it’s legal.

And unfortunately, the only way to fully protect yourself on the Internet is to use certain android devices or programs and you miss out on a lot of the functions. IE Google play and everything it supports.

so you will lose a lot of features and as of now you cannot use an iOS system for these secure systems.

 

[BSO Dave]

Unfortunately illegal crossings will never stop regardless who's the president.

Let's see how this ages in 4 years....

 

[Altitude sickness]

Unfortunately Doubleplay is correct. Illegal border crossing will never get to zero. But 1000 per month would be much better than 10,000 per day.

Also, this 14th amendment argument would not even be an issue if we were only talking 1000 illegal immigrants per month and maybe 100 births per month.

The reason it’s such an issue is it a cottage industry to get your butt onto this dirt before you drop a baby?
Are there any other countries so ridiculously stupid or have that much money to waste like we apparently do?

 

[BSO Dave]

Unfortunately Doubleplay is correct. Illegal border crossing will never get to zero. But 1000 per month would be much better than 10,000 per day.

Firstly, zero illegal crossings in unrealistic... However, he is asserting that NO POTUS can have a significant impact on illegal immigration, and that is an opinion, not fact...

The sad facts are that current immigration laws that we have had in place for decades have not been enforced... The immigration system in this country needs reform to account for new challenges, but basic enforcement has been non-existent for the last 4 years... Trump was the first to make a serious attempt at enforcement during his first term and the results were significant... The fact that a POTUS has to resort to EOs to enforce immigration law is a pitiful testament to the failure of Congress in passing and facilitating the enforcement of these laws along with the necessary personnel and infrastructure...

Regardless, Trumps EO's will have a significant impact and are far better than not only the lack of enforcement, but the encouragement and facilitation of illegal immigration by this last Administration...