Politics

[Aaron N]

Quick question, who’s the only country to invoke Article 5 within NATO?

 

[YancyW]

Doesn’t permanent residence status in the U.S. give that Columbia University guy first amendment rights? View attachment 670413

I don’t personally understand why he would choose to support Palestinian Terrorism but it looks like he still has the right to free speech

That status can be revoked if someone is deemed a national security threat.

 

[Red Leg]

I think he’s just proving he can flip the switch any time he likes… another means for forcing Zelenskkys hand… if Ukraine doesn’t capitulate quickly he’ll flip the switch back the other direction fairly soon..

It’s barbaric..

But I’m guessing effective..

I would have hoped another set of terms would describe the expectations for Ukraine, but I think you are likely very accurate.

 

[Tubby’s Canteen]

Quick question, who’s the only country to invoke Article 5 within NATO?

It was bush in the fallout immediately following 9/11 wasn’t it. Can’t think of any other time it’s been invoked.

 

[Red Leg]

Quick question, who’s the only country to invoke Article 5 within NATO?

Excellent point. The US - 911 - and the alliance responded.

 

[Tubby’s Canteen]

That status can be revoked if someone is deemed a national security threat.

Can he be tried then or only expelled?

 

[YancyW]

Can he be tried then or only expelled?

Could be both, depends on a countless number of variables. If there is evidence he facilitated the activities that lead of crimes being committed against jewish students at Columbia, there are a number of federal crimes that could be associated. I haven't seen the arrest documents or any charging statements, so I don't know on that front.

 

[Tanks]

You knew full well any deal was going to involve Russia keeping some of the territory gains and Zelenskyy losing power?

I don’t know whether you negotiated any contracts or own your own business but as a rule one doesn’t concede everything before even sitting at the table.

 

[YancyW]

I don’t know whether you negotiated any contracts or own your own business but as a rule one doesn’t concede everything before even sitting at the table.

I don’t compare to you, and I mean that genuinely, but I do own businesses on my own. They are small, but I have 20 full-time employees and a handful of contractors. I was also an executive at a fortune 10 company, where I managed healthcare contracts generating billions annually. These contracts routinely had multiple negotiated amendments per year.

I do know a bit about this subject, but in this case, that doesn’t matter at all. Ukraine isn’t at the table. Back to my point—you generally have a very good ballpark idea of where things will shake out in the end. Two elements of that are going to be Russia keeps some of the ground they have taken thus far and Zelenskyy won't be allowed to maintain power.

 

[observe]

https://www.statecapture.org.za/site/information/reports


.....and NOTHING happened to any of these crooks in Parliament that still think they can threaten USA or that they for all in South Africa........!

 

[MauserM03Blog]

Could it possibly be your smarmy, condescending manner of speaking that makes Americans resistant to your point of view?

Pretty sure that’s it for me. But WTF do I know? I’m not a scientist and all that.

I'm not an oncologist. But if I found that the vast majority of the world's oncologists were trying tell me something, I'd listen to them before I listened to an unqualified politician who says they're all wrong.

 

[flatwater bill]

Disappointed to see that Ukrainian journalist Vadym Karpiak called for the assassination of Pres Trump last Friday. A USAID funded and State operated media employee at that. Cover photo shows him shaking hands and receiving an award from Zelenskyy (although the post was on FB personal page). Remember when Joe Biden got the Prosecutor in Ukraine fired for looking into Hunter's graft money? Maybe Karpiak needs a new career...this kind of thing won't help with the begging. On a lighter note, here's some headlines before and after the CIA fueled proxy war., before the propaganda told us to waive flags in support of democracy.....FWB

 

[Scott CWO]

You made me laugh out loud. Well done.

Chances are the burning you saw in Africa was done in the cool season, to reduce the build up of fire hazards and catastrophic fires in the dry season. This results in less CO2 being released overall. It's measurable. The same thing is done here in the Northern Territory. Undertaking managed, cool season hazard reduction fires results in carbon credits which are tradable. The land is rejuvenated. The buffalo love it.

We're familiar with hot season, catastrophic fires and the CO2 they release. To be avoided. Due to climate change, they're happening in cool seasons in some places. Perhaps somewhere near you?

So, you haven’t been to Africa! The burning is wide spread in central and southern parts of Africa. These aren’t climate caused wildfires. These fires are set by the locals, trackers and PHs to burn the dead high grass and draw wildlife to the new green growth that quickly develops. These fires are intentionally set by people and are not counted in your bogus 14:1 ratio that just measures activities like driving and manufacturing.