Politics

[spike.t]

I think I’m gonna build an app. Similar to the dating apps

to match up illegal gang members and crazy leftists. They can take them into their homes. Hang out together. Let their wives and daughters take leisurely strolls on jogging paths together.

Lovable, misunderstood, fun seeking Homie looking for Naïve idiot.View attachment 679500

Who is going to print off so I can order some targets.....my printer is buggered....can post around the place for shooting fun... ...to order originals is probably not PC....

 

[Wheels]

I’m not sure you would call this direct evidence or not, or if you consider someone having a gang symbol tattooed on their body as evidence.
Here is the liberal buffoon senator with the terrorist in El Salvador. Look closely at his left hand.

This gang has been labeled as a terrorist organizationView attachment 679517View attachment 679518

I have read elsewhere that the marijuana stands for M, the skull stands for S, followed by the 13.

 

[LivingTheDream]

When somone willingly admits to a felony

Let's be clear on what willingly is. If you plead guilty you will do 1 to 3 months, if you go to trial and found guilty you will do 10 to 20 years. Also to fight it with a lawyer will cost you between 250k to 500k. And the trial will be in DC, with a jury from DC, who voted 90% democrat the last election.

Not sure if that is how you would define willingly or not.

 

[Aaron N]

You seem to believe in whatever fits your narrative.

Everyone does, that's human nature

 

[BSO Dave]

Everyone does, that's human nature

This may be true in the general sense, but that's not the problem...

The problems occur in the process by which each of us uses to form said narratives...

 

[Wheels]

President Donald Trump has unilaterally imposed tariffs on much of the world. Yet the authority to impose tariffs is nowhere to be found in Article II of the Constitution, which is where the limited powers of the president are enumerated. Rather, the authority "to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises," as well as the authority "to regulate Commerce with Foreign nations," is to be found exclusively in Article I, which is where the powers of Congress are spelled out.

MAGA republicans just follow thier orange demigod and keep praying he will make everything ok..

Tariffs are probably not a good example to try and use for Trump overreach. I think every President since FDR has unilaterally imposed tariffs without a vote from Congress. This was all basically approved and set in place with the help of Congress in passing:

Tariff Act of 1930

Emergency Economic Powers Act

Trade Expansion Act of 1962

Trade Act of 1974

 

[Aaron N]

This may be true in the general sense, but that's not the problem...

The problems occur in the process by which each of us uses to form said narratives...

it’s only a problem when it’s the opposing views process though, isn’t it

 

[WAB]

Fk me excellent..am on my way , so when I get there I can buy as many guns as I want....2nd amendment and all that

You would be very welcome!

 

[spike.t]

You would be very welcome!

.....now need to save up for the warehouse I would need....

 

[Brent in Az]

Fk me excellent..am on my way , so when I get there I can buy as many guns as I want....2nd amendment and all that

Getting them back to Africa might be a wee bit of a problem......

 

[spike.t]

Getting them back to Africa might be a wee bit of a problem......

Read above your post..

 

[Brent in Az]

Read above your post..

Ahhh ...an american warehouse.

 

[BSO Dave]

it’s only a problem when it’s the opposing views process though, isn’t it

No... Not at all... It applies to all narratives... But, there is a difference that is quite simple...

I have no problem with anyone who holds a different view from mine when they form their narrative based on tangible, credible foundations such as the application of critical thought, common sense, factual information, and opinions formed out of personal experience and not hearsay...

The problem I am referring to occurs when someone forms a narrative based on non-credible foundations formed through ignorance, indoctrination, misinformation, and emotion. When this occurs, the narrative can no longer be taken seriously in my view...

 

[Aaron N]

No... Not at all... It applies to all narratives... But, there is a difference that is quite simple...

I have no problem with anyone who holds a different view from mine when they form their narrative based on tangible, credible foundations such as the application of critical thought, common sense, factual information, and opinions formed out of personal experience and not hearsay...

The problem I am referring to occurs when someone forms a narrative based on non-credible foundations forms through ignorance, indoctrination, misinformation, and emotion. When this occurs, the narrative can no longer be taken seriously in my view...

Fair enough,

But one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist.

 

[BSO Dave]

Fair enough,

But one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist.

Now you're talking about perspective which is not the same as narrative...

I agree with you to the extent that some perspectives are often formed from personal experience which is a credible foundation...

 

[Tanks]

…

I did a quick search, but I count find any of your posts condemning the unconstitutionality of the Biden Administration violating the due process of J-6er's... Where was your outrage over the denial of due process over ACTAUL American citizens?

Doesn’t going through a jury trial count as due process? How were they denied due process?

 

[CJW]

Do you believe in due process?

Never said I didn't. Simply asked a question. Please answer it.

 

[wesheltonj]

Two immigration judges found him to be a gang member. What more “proof” do you need when it’s already been proven in immigration court?

He did get due process in the USA. He had a hearing in immigration court and then appealed and lost his appeal. The reason he was not deported to his home country was violence from a rival gang. That problem is resolved. The USA did not jail him in his own county, his home county did that because he is a MS 13 member.

 

[Datchew]

I see.

Democrats are funny. One would have thought that Trump was still president for the entire four years of Biden’s term based on how any and everything bad was his fault even after 2020. Now he’s also president of El Salvador. I wonder what he will be president of next?

It’d be nice if the left could decide whether he was incompetent or omnipotent.

You appeal to what is a fallacy for democrats - the myth of consistency.

 

[John Wasmuth]

Rep. Comer says no to Sen. Van Hollens travel on tax payers dime.