WAB
AH ambassador
It seems like you are going to put a lot of effort and money into a rifle that will have low resale value and appeal. Why not put your efforts into a build that will result in a more valuable end product?
As a side note, Walker told the Remington brass he could “fix” the trigger sear issue from his original design for 2 cents per trigger group. Remington declined and the resulting decision is history.If I recall correctly, the 700 Remington and its predecessors were designed by famed bench rest competitor Mike Walker with the idea of providing maximum accuracy with minimum expense. One of the cost cutting features was a bolt handle attached to the bolt body by brazing. I have personally experienced a Remington 700 bolt handle coming loose from the bolt body as a result of cycling the action on an empty chamber, not something I would care to experience in the heat of an encounter with dangerous game. The trigger, also designed by Walker, has cost Remington a great deal of money settling lawsuits based on its propensity to fire the rifle when the safety is disengaged.
My first "African battery" consisted of three identical rifles in caliber 7mm Remington Magnum, .375/.338 (.375 Chatfield-Taylor) and .458 Winchester Magnum, all built on high number Springfield actions. They never made it to Africa, but I am satisfied they would have done the job, if called upon to do so.
Comparing any of the versions of the R700 placed in the hands of US armed forces to a build done at a gunsmith isn't even close...and you know it. Just the selection process of choosing the absolute best actions and barrels would set it apart from an off the shelf build. Not to mention having them hand tuned, properly bedded in a stock that is custom fit to the shooter...etc, etc, etc.Maybe it is just me, but I seem to remember many satisfied customers who went after most definitely dangerous game, in most definitely dangerous circumstances, from the jungle to the sand box, with the Rem 700 shooting from commercial .308 to way above SAAMI pressure .300 Win Mag (Black Hills 220 gr Mk 248 Mod1)
View attachment 448145
Internet pic, Chuck Mawhinney and his M40 in Vietnam
View attachment 448129
Internet pic, M40 in Iraq, United States Department of Defense imagery database.
View attachment 448144
Internet pic, MK 13 in Afghanistan, United States Department of Defense imagery database.
Does the Rem 700 defy the sacrosanct credo of CRF and external claw extractor? Heck yes!
Does this make it a garbage gun? Heck no! You gotta be kidding, right?
Hah, but the extractor!!!! Well, I do not know how many folks who pontificate about it have had brass stuck in a Rem 700 action, but I have ... a dozen times, on a .300 Win Mag Remington Defense / Accuracy International Mk 13 Marine Corps sniper rifle civilian clone. Somehow the Black Hills .300 Win Mag 190 gr HPBT Match ammo (civilian clone of the M 248 Mod 0 load) stuck in my rifle and it took a rubber mallet to open the bolt ... a dozen times, until I was absolutely certain that this was a systemic issue, and, guess what, every time the Rem 700 maligned extractor pulled the stuck case out of the chamber! I could not get it out with my bare hands on the bolt - I needed the mallet - but the extractor sure could get it out...
View attachment 448151
My own Rem 700 Mk 13 civilian clone
PS: admittedly, liability lawyers and lean manufacturing cost-cutters have destroyed what used to be a great trigger on the Rem 700, so just like I replaced the set trigger on my CZ 550s I replaced the Rem trigger on my 700, but do not fool yourself, the Rem 700 will do the job in Africa (even though it is not what I personally use there).
Actually with decent ammo that is a very good, reliable brown bear back up gun. Those have the superior, old reliable Win 70 trigger and the Win 70 push feed extractor is far superior to any Rem 700 "nub-on-a-cheesy-ring" extractor. Poor for that job would be a Rem 700 with boxed trigger full of years of accumulated junk or frozen in low temps and a balky or broken nub extractor.A current bear guide/outfitter here in SE Alaska uses a rusty push feed post ‘64 model 70 in .458. A picture of that model is in the dictionary next to the word junk.
All that said I have never had any issues with it feeding or extracting and think the CRF argument is completely ridiculous. You aren't going into combat. The chances of a no kidding buffalo charge are probably extremely small and you have a PH with a sizable rifle to back you up. A lot of folks will try to talk you into building or buying a designer gun because they have a lot of money and like to beat their chests about their overpriced rifles with CRF and german optics and a bunch of other stuff that won't matter if you hit on your first shot. I'd be willing to bet I could outshoot over 90% of these clowns with my Rem700 action at any distance, most especially the ones with guns that run in the 3,000-8,000 dollar range. Dentists can't shoot.I have a Rem 700XCR in 375H&H that I used on a buffalo hunt. I found the rifle to be a little long and awkward to carry through tall grass and I swear it recoils almost as much as my 416. I would probably go in another direction if I had it to do again.
My apologies. I don't mean to be crass but the 700 is a very capable action. I'm not sure there is any component quite as important as the shooter. This 2.5 inch sighter was shot 8 times from 1,000 yards with a 308 built on a 700 action. I would love to see a blaser do it. If the OP can shoot he will do just fine with his 700 if that's what he prefers.Be nice now.