Does anyone has info on shorter bullets for 458 win mag to minimize compression of powder? Does anyone still make a tungsten core bullet or high density bullet to squeeze a little more powder space for the 458 win mag?
Rick
Rick
Does anyone has info on shorter bullets for 458 win mag to minimize compression of powder? Does anyone still make a tungsten core bullet or high density bullet to squeeze a little more powder space for the 458 win mag?
Rick
Stubby bullets don't have a great ballistic coefficient.
They will shed velocity rapidly and are more likely to become unstable.
Suggest you check for slightly faster powders rather than maxing out etc.
Dwight,
Agreed on DG range and bullets.
An acquaintance of mine has used a handgun to kill numerous African big game animals and those bullets do look a bit "stubby" by comparison with most rifle bullets, but they took the game. My best hunting buddy has taken multiple Cape buff with his .45-70 and some more with my .45-90. All those bullets looked a bit "stubby" compared to some big bore rifle bullets which are pointed, but the buffalo are dead and the hunter unscathed. They were also well under 100 yards range, as was the .45-90 ele and my 1895 .405 buff (both at 20 yards).
When responding to Rick's original question, I could only speak from my personal experience. BTW, in range testing with a .45-70 at 50 yards, the 430 grain Punch Bullet was the only bullet that shot through a 5/8 th inch steel plate. Even monolithic copper bullets flattened into pretty jewelry. We reckoned that if the punch would shoot through that steel plate, it would "punch" through an ele skull; just what happened.