gballard137
AH member
- Joined
- May 16, 2023
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 45
So it’s possible because the trigger is 2 separate parts it may not be pulling the sear forward to let release the firing pin
Theoretically yes, that could be it. But since it works 99% of the times, and has only failed to work specifically when I attempt to fireform 416 brass, I'm not sure.So it’s possible because the trigger is 2 separate parts it may not be pulling the sear forward to let release the firing pin
@gballard137
Head space can affect the bolt which can affect the trigger, especially if the trigger is separate from the receiver/bolt. If head space is wrong and loading a shell binds the bolt, it can take it out of alignment with trigger. I have seen this occur when undertaking my current 404 rebuild. The 30-06 barrel on the BRNO vz.24 action was not installed properly. When I loaded a couple of decapped reloads to test the action I had trouble closing the bolt and it wouldn't dry fire.@gballard137
Similar set up to the SMLE trigger. They can be affected but the screw tension and bedding as well.
I would bed the bottom metal to reduce the risk of it bending when the action is torqued down. Pillar bedding will help as well. It only take a millipoofteenth of a bend to upset the apple cart.
Headspace CAN'T affect the trigger in any way, so I would seriously look at bedding the bottom metal.
Bob
I agree with Bob. When the bolt is closed headspace of the brass won’t affect the trigger as the bolt is in the same position even if you don’t have a cartridge in the chamber.@gballard137
Similar set up to the SMLE trigger. They can be affected but the screw tension and bedding as well.
I would bed the bottom metal to reduce the risk of it bending when the action is torqued down. Pillar bedding will help as well. It only take a millipoofteenth of a bend to upset the apple cart.
Headspace CAN'T affect the trigger in any way, so I would seriously look at bedding the bottom metal.
Bob
I agree with Bob. When the bolt is closed headspace of the brass won’t affect the trigger as the bolt is in the same position even if you don’t have a cartridge in the chamber.
It’s possible that because you have used a 550 Stock that the bottom metal and action is further apart.
Also Maybe there is another issue that ain’t related to the trigger being in 2 pieces that is being overlooked just because it is a 2 piece trigger.
Everyone has different ideas and even if we disagree with someone it’s better to voice your idea and it be wrong then too not say it and that could have fixed the issue
Agree with your questions 100%. These design flaws are among the very few weaknesses of the BRNO rifles. I do think however that this was changed with the release of the CZ 550 lineup that was launched after BRNO’s 600, 601 and 602 models were discontinued sometime in the 80’s or so? Not 100% sure, but I think the CZ triggers are of more traditional construction, i.e. Installed as an integrated part of the action itself?That is good news! Hopefully that 100% solves the problem. Two things about those BRNO/CZ triggers, a question for the engineers who orinalluy designed them 1) Why put a set trigger on an obviously hunting, non-target rifle? 2) Why disconnect the two trigger parts- with one attached to the action and the other attached to the bottom metal? Both never made sense to me and never will.