BeeMaa
AH ambassador
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2017
- Messages
- 7,458
- Reaction score
- 20,124
- Location
- Alexandria, VA USA
- Media
- 148
- Articles
- 1
- Member of
- NRA Life Member, SCI Member
- Hunted
- Eastern US & RSA
"Change is the only constant in life" Heraclitus (Greek philosopher)
Hunting is no exception to this. There will be a constant evolution in the equipment used and there is very little one can do to stop or even slow down this change. Ethics are the question here, not necessarily the technology but how it's used.
For instance...using a drone. I would consider using a drone to locate game that has been shot (or at least shot at and possibly wounded) ethical. However using a drone to locate game to then shoot at I consider unethical. This is my opinion on drones, you are entitled to yours.
So now turn it up a bit...using dogs. Using dogs to find downed or wounded animals is quite common in Africa and around the world. However dogs are also used to find game like birds, foxes, hogs, mountain lion, black bear...etc. Where do the ethics fall on this. Is it OK to use a dog to locate game to be harvested but not a drone? Is it simply because a drone is electronic and the dog is not? What about the modern training techniques for getting dogs into hunting shape? Is that not technology? Or is it just ethical because that's the way it's been done for years?
So at the core of it, even I'm conflicted on some level. It's OK to use dogs for both, but not drones? But it does raise the larger question of ethics when using any new technology. Where each individual falls will vary, across a broad spectrum I'm sure.
This post is by no means a troll, those of you who know me already know this. I'm respectfully opening up the discussion of ethics. Specifically to thermals as it applies to this thread.
Hunting is no exception to this. There will be a constant evolution in the equipment used and there is very little one can do to stop or even slow down this change. Ethics are the question here, not necessarily the technology but how it's used.
For instance...using a drone. I would consider using a drone to locate game that has been shot (or at least shot at and possibly wounded) ethical. However using a drone to locate game to then shoot at I consider unethical. This is my opinion on drones, you are entitled to yours.
So now turn it up a bit...using dogs. Using dogs to find downed or wounded animals is quite common in Africa and around the world. However dogs are also used to find game like birds, foxes, hogs, mountain lion, black bear...etc. Where do the ethics fall on this. Is it OK to use a dog to locate game to be harvested but not a drone? Is it simply because a drone is electronic and the dog is not? What about the modern training techniques for getting dogs into hunting shape? Is that not technology? Or is it just ethical because that's the way it's been done for years?
So at the core of it, even I'm conflicted on some level. It's OK to use dogs for both, but not drones? But it does raise the larger question of ethics when using any new technology. Where each individual falls will vary, across a broad spectrum I'm sure.
This post is by no means a troll, those of you who know me already know this. I'm respectfully opening up the discussion of ethics. Specifically to thermals as it applies to this thread.
Last edited: