Ultimately I don’t think appeasing the antis is anyone’s first and foremost concern (or a concern at all). It seems like more than a few members want to make that an issue because it would help the pro CBL argument but it’s just not true.. Getting rid of unethical practices so as to make hunting either less objectionable or more palatable to sensible non-hunting (and voting) public is more like it. CBL has too much bad publicity, hunting in general does too but at least ethical hunting is defensible scientifically and on the basis of conservation. CBL is indefensible. The primary objection is that it’s unethical. It’s just put and take with added negative characteristics.
Last edited: