HankBuck
AH elite
- Joined
- May 7, 2023
- Messages
- 1,752
- Reaction score
- 3,416
- Location
- U.S. Virginia
- Hunted
- Tanzania,BC, Ontario, Quebec, Mexico, Alaska, WY, MT, KS, ME, PA, ID, AL, NC, SC, NJ, NY, VT, NH, TX,
Aaron, your logic is correct but the circumstances & environment have changed so much over the last 150 - 200 years that it’s now inaccurate. In the continental US there is no longer 1000s of square miles of uninterrupted Wilderness - and one pack of wolves ranges over 1000s of square miles, they can travel 100+ miles in one direction in a few days, they know No Boundaries. Because a pack of wolves must Now must remain in a concentrated area - a much smaller area (a few 100 sq miles vs 1000s) they have a bigger impact on Elk, deer, Moose populations then they previously had. There is No Way to “recreate the past” Unless we completely remove all human population, cities, etc.. Wolves no longer “fit” in the Continental 48 and while they can be reintroduced - it will come at a price to other Big Game animals - including Cougar. The people most in favor of Wolf reintroduction are those that will live no where near the wolves, will Not have their livestock, pets, horses affected etc. Wolves were not eradicated from the lower 48 by accident, wolves were not compatible with human habitation 200 years ago and they are less compatible now. While I also have mixed feelings and think the loss of any native species is cause for alarm - I believe that there is now room for only a very limited wolf population and they will need to be carefully managed - hunted & trapped - to keep population levels under control.So based on the logic here, lions, leopards, and cheetahs should also never be reintroduced to their historical ranges? Predators are part of a healthy eco-system whether it’s convenient for us or not.