akrifleman
AH veteran
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
- Messages
- 226
- Reaction score
- 472
- Location
- Palmer, AK
- Media
- 2
- Member of
- Long Range Shooters of Alaska, Alaska Rifle Club, SCI, AK Wild Sheep, PRS, PRS22, NRA RSO
- Hunted
- South Africa, AK, SD, NC, GA, FL, WY
They're really one in the same. There's really nothing wrong with the 375 Ruger. It's just that there was really never a need for it. It's hard to dispute that. Like I said about re-inventing the wheel.
Shorter action = No real benefit.
Beltless round = The 375HH doesn't typically have feed issues because it's not a giant cartridge like the 458WM or 458 Lott.
Shorter barrel = You could potentially make an slight argument here. Does a 2" off a 24" barrel really matter? I don't personally, think it does. Especially when you look at the 375HH as a short to mid-range round to begin with. Not long range. Why are we even going shorter? Are we trying to make a bush-gun?
Minimal velocity increase = Not worth speaking about.
It's not a bad round. Is it worth the extra work to find ammo and reloading supplies? That depends on the person I suppose. If you like it, go for it. If you reload and have the supplies, have at it. The fact it has "Ruger" at the end of it and is one of the only offerings in the Hawkeye, feels a little nepotistic and money-grabby to me.
There's a couple really iconic African rounds out there. Two of which are the 375HH and the 416 Rigby. Why they would reinvent them makes absolutely no sense. The 416 makes even less sense.
You realize only like 300 416 Rigby's existed from inception until Bill Ruger started making them in 1991? He dramatically quadrupled the number extant.
The only thing iconic about it is our imagination and a writer with a hero worship complex. Almost nobody actually ever saw them in use.
It is called a false nostalgia. It is like you have watched to many pirate movies, and now an eye patch means pirate, when it never actually was the case in real life.
Last edited: