I have very different take. That sounded very well reasoned to me. It is also a response from a woman who has served both as an enlisted soldier and commissioned officer. She has been deployed, and currently holds the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. I strongly agree with her position with respect to a draft. I am genuinely interested what you found to be so "leftist."
I have served with female officers and enlisted personnel my whole career. Field Artillery was something of the pace setter within combat arms. Like their male counterparts, they ran the gambit with respect to performance. I do believe there are some jobs for which most women should not be expected to perform. For instance a tank or howitzer crew breaking track is a brutally physical endeavor. Rucking in body armor is not for the frail (man or woman). It is why any real integration of women into those MOS's has been very very slow and is likely to never amount to a significant percentage of the force.
But for most military positions, I have no issue with a woman who meets the physical and other standards for the billet. We have had some superb Apache pilots and gunners who were female. The air force seems to be generally pleased with the quality of female pilots they are creating - many who have also seen combat. Women in the armed services aren't going anywhere.
Gabbard has supported different messages on the 2A, but then again she was representing Hawaii. She apparently has also done some competitive shooting.
View attachment 647585