deewayne2003
AH elite
I see the tariffs as a way of counter acting several other issues at hand such as China's currency manipulation that has been an issue for well over a decade; as well as their manipulation of their GDP by counting construction based on completed projects instead of sold/acquired as we do in the USA.listen to the Shapiro link posted on the previous page..
those values being listed as tariffs being charged to the US arent actually tariff values at all.. they are based on a formula that calculates trade deficits, tariffs, and other unrelated items..
He uses Korea as an example where the average tariff is less than 1%.. we have a free trade agreement in place with South Korea..
They come up with a 50% value to assign to SK because the trade deficit is so huge between the two countries.. in a nutshell Americans buy a crap ton load of Korean stuff and Koreans don't buy a lot of American stuff.. and they want it to apply to "tariffs".. (which is wrong)..
Which is the same debate that's gone back and forth with @Tubby’s Canteen .. who cares that Canadians buy more American stuff than Americans buy Canadian stuff? Its a completely different argument and really shouldn't be applied.. its apples to oranges..
Trump is now making the same incorrect argument..
The even worse case Shapiro presented was the "tariff" value placed on Madagascar.. which is largely based on the huge trade deficit we have with Madagascar..
Well no shit.. is anyone actually surprised that we buy more stuff from Madagascar than they buy from us? The average annual wage in Madagascar is $506... they cant afford American made stuff.. but American consumers love Madagascar vanilla, cotton, sugar, coffee, and shellfish.. which are all very affordable.. We're consumers.. and they arent... so we buy a lot of their stuff that we want, and they don't buy a lot of our stuff that they cant afford..
Why is that a bad thing?
And why would that motivate us to put a 43% tariff on the stuff they sell us.. fully knowing they arent buying any of our stuff anyway?
Im all for true "reciprocal" tariffs.. if its fair and reasonable for Country XXXX.. then its fair and reasonable for the US as well.. other countries don't get to protect their industries and then cry when the US protects its industries.. the argument "you're bigger! you have a bigger economy! etc" doesn't fly.. every country on the planet has the opportunity to grow their economies and population any way they see fit.. If your country hasn't managed itself as well, that's a problem created by your country.. its not a problem my country needs to resolve.. If the other country doesn't want to bow to a reciprocal tariff, then they need to come to the table with something else of strategic or economic value to trade..
But these arent "reciprocal" tariffs at all.. they're in many cases actually nonsense..
This is why you have complete cities in China that are empty, their just building for the sake of manipulating their numbers.
This South African born and raised man lived in China for 14 years and reports on the reality of the Chinese economy as well as their state of society.
Construction GPD for China
2020 11%
2021 25.7%
However by 2024 it had fallen to 6.8%
So now China is moving onto ship building...
Point being, their are many economic issues/manipulations that are going on world wide and I see the tariffs as a "low hanging fruit" in an attempt to balance manipulations that otherwise not much can be done.