Brent in Az
AH ambassador
It's a testament of what this country faces, when the tallying cry for the Democrat party and it's media lapdogs, revolves around a piece of filth from El Salvador
That would depend on what the opposing view is...for example a communist working out a set of dialectic principles deserves no standing as an equal.it’s only a problem when it’s the opposing views process though, isn’t it
Part of me hopes that they do. It’s entertaining to say the least. However, the more rational side of me hopes for a return to more rational politics. Having two extreme choices is not in the best interest of our country.So Democrats want the party to go more left....
Very true. The leftist train has gone off the railsSeems like the right is an actual enemy of the left. I don't believe we'll ever see both parties working for the good of the country and people. It's all about them and their party.![]()
Doesn’t going through a jury trial count as due process? How were they denied due process?
AmericanThanks to the america hating ACLU, the Supreme Court has blocked Trump from deporting the detained Venezuelans in northern Texas under the alien enemies act.
Thomas and Alito took the low road and dissented.
Every politician, federal employee, law enforcement personnel, responsible for the horrific treatment of these J6'ers, and the violation of their rights, needs to be rounded up and given the same treatment. Eye for an eye.I posted a link to an article a few pages back that stated the many examples of how due process was being denied on a wholesale level to the J-6 detainees... There are dozens of articles and books all over the internet documenting these egregious violations if you actually care to research in detail...
The quick summary is that going through a jury trial alone is not the entire scheme of due process... The entirety of the 1,583 defendants arrested in relation to J-6 had been held without bail. This included the vast majority who were eventually charged with simple misdemeanors which is unheard of...
They were also denied their right to confer with legal counsel, timely arraignments, hearings, and a speedy trial after the arraignments eventually took place... They were also denied the right to review evidence against them and as we now have learned the evidence which was suppressed and withheld by the J-6 committee... As of January 5, 2025, 500 cases were still pending and undecided, and of those 500, 170 detainees were still awaiting trial 4 years later...
Additionally, detainees were kept in 23-hour solitary confinement in filthy cells with poor food and no opportunity to bathe. They were also denied their rights to family visitations.
The US ( Trump ) adminstration determined him a criminal even though a judge within his power provided him protected status in a US court and he has no criminal convictions. Thinking someone is guilty of a crime has never in itself been sufficent to imprison some one. If someone thinks you are guilty and that is enough to be imprisoned then we should all be getting nervous.
As far as supporting him he was providing a service and making a living he did not need to be supported.
I'll be sure to let you know if I survive the hunt with my dreaded can making my barrel an extra 3" over factory length.
I think the anti-suppressor case is more of aesthetics and fashion rather than practical function.
Exactly. Several on here are of same brainwashed thought process and obviously get their news from MSNBC, CNN, etc.@jruby
In my last post describing how due process was denied to J-6 detainees in addition to the horrible sub-human confinement and living conditions they were also subjected to, you responded with a laughing emoji?
What exactly is so funny? Seriously man, WTF is wrong with you?
He/she, is a leftist troll@jruby
In my last post describing how due process was denied to J-6 detainees in addition to the horrible sub-human confinement and living conditions they were also subjected to, you responded with a laughing emoji?
What exactly is so funny? Seriously man, WTF is wrong with you?
I find you thinking it's OK to attack our capital and you finding excuses why you think it's OK. The election was never stolen and no court cases ever proved it was stolen. You are so far up Trumps rear you will support him regardless of what he does even if he decides to go against SCOTUS. So what's wrong with you. I am done with discussion.@jruby
In my last post describing how due process was denied to J-6 detainees in addition to the horrible sub-human confinement and living conditions they were also subjected to, you responded with a laughing emoji?
What exactly is so funny? Seriously man, WTF is wrong with you?
I find you thinking it's OK to attack our capital and you finding excuses why you think it's OK. The election was never stolen and no court cases ever proved it was stolen. You are so far up Trumps rear you will support him regardless of what he does even if he decides to go against SCOTUS. So what's wrong with you. I am done with discussion.