The .500/.416 Nitro Express 3-1/4”

USAN

AH fanatic
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
670
Reaction score
389
Deals & offers
2
Media
359
Articles
54
The history of double rifle cartridges is a long and colored one; many of them were developed in the black powder era, and others in the transition-era, when Cordite was the propellant du jour. These cartridges were largely designed around the heavy-for-caliber cup-and-core round nosed and full-patch bullets of yesteryear, and the guns were regulated for relatively close shooting. Almost all of the designs were rimmed cartridges; the rimmed case giving just about the best headspacing available. While the rimmed cartridges didn’t work very well in the repeating rifles, they work just fine in the single-shot and double rifles.

_MG_5515-2.jpg



There are some double rifles chambered for the rimless and belted cartridges, but the rimmed cases offer the easiest and most positive extraction. The reputation and performance the .416 Rigby - and later the .416 Remington – was undeniable, and while there are doubles chambered to these cartridges, Kreighoff saw the wisdom of a rimmed cartridge using a .416” diameter bullet. Early in 1996, Kreighoff unveiled the .500/.416 Nitro Express 3 ¼”, based on the proven .500 Nitro Express case, with a nice, long neck for good bullet tension, a good taper for easy feeding under duress, and enough case capacity to mimic the performance of the rimless .416s. The result was a winner – the .500/.416 NE pushes a 410-grain bullet at 2,325 fps, for just under 5,000 ft.-lbs. of energy at the muzzle. This ballistic formula has been used on the largest game on earth with great results, and in a double rifle, will allow for the reliable, immediate second shot that double rifle shooters have come to appreciate.

So, why choose the .500/.416 over the classic double rifle cartridges? What advantages does it have over the other, earlier calibers and designs? Well, here’s how I look at it: the classic .450/400 3” NE is one of my absolute favorite rimmed calibers, and probably continue to be so, for a couple of reasons. One, it offers a heavier bullet weight – 400 grains – than do the .375 and 9.3mm bores, and I like that better for dangerous game. Two, it offers less muzzle jump than does the .450 NE or the .470 NE, which allows the shooter to get back on target quicker for a much faster second shot, an important feature when it comes to dangerous game. Yes, I know about the arguments for larger frontal diameter and heavier throw weight, but I also recall the experiences I’ve had using the .416 Remington Magnum and .404 Jeffery on dangerous game. The .500/.416 NE bridges a huge gap between the .450/400 and the .450 NE, and offers a shooting experience closer to the .450/400, while giving plenty of power for hunting any and all dangerous game.

_MG_5516-2.jpg



While I totally see the case for the larger bores if you are a Professional Hunter, I think that the .450/.400 and .500/.416 make a great choice for the traveling sportsman. When comparing the two, the .500/.416 offers a bit more frontal diameter (.416” v. .411”) and a considerable increase in velocity (2,325 vs. 2,050 to 2,125, depending on manufacturer), so it boils down to whether you desire a bit more reach-out-and-touch-‘em or the lesser recoil of the lighter cartridge. What I see in the .500/.416 NE is a double rifle cartridge with a performance level on par with the highly familiar .416 Rigby, yet available in the quick handling double rifles. The pair of 410-grain Woodleigh bullets – a soft point and a solid for the classic ‘right-and-a-left’ – has a high Sectional Density figure of 0.338, and will deliver the excellent performance that Woodleigh is famous for.

Available in Kreighoff and Heym double rifles, the Norma African PH ammo, loaded with those excellent Woodleigh projectiles, is one of the best sources of ammunition for this excellent newer cartridge.
 
My Ruger No.1 in 450/400 will meet and exceed the 500/416. But if I were to by a double this would be what I would want.
 
My Ruger No.1 in 450/400 will meet and exceed the 500/416. But if I were to by a double this would be what I would want.
A 500/416 NE handloaded in a Ruger No. 1 will shoot rings around a 450/400 NE on the same platform...

Moot point really both are double rifle caliber...in a double the 500/416 NE will put the 450/400 NE nose down....

The 500/416 NE is a brilliant development, I am very surprised it has not been more popular...it fills a huge gap between 450/400 NE and 450 NE and up cartridges....

Probably the holy grail for lion and buffalo hunting in a double.....

Could not imagine a better 2 barrel double rifle set than a 500 NE with a second set in 500/416 NE...you would be covered for all DG and some properly not marginally.....
 
I've long debated this cartridge's capabilities, in both doubles, and a Falling Block rifle; suspect its ability to reach out that little bit further in a D/R would outperform just about any and all D/R rounds ...
 
I have a kreighoff dr in this caliber. It has taken elephant, buffalo, hippo, zebra, kudu, sable, and impala. In fact it is so fun and accurate to shoot that it is the only gun I bring anymore. If I can’t get close enough to shoot the animal with the red dot, we move closer. It makes africa really fun to hunt now. I have shot most animals this there is no real pressure to fill a bag anymore. It will kill and stop anything effectively. Love it.
 
A bit of research has shown that Heym chambers it in their 89B as well; interesting indeed!!
 
This was a niche that actually needed filling, unlike some wildcats out there. Would be an interesting and effective choice!
 
Was shopping around for an 89b this evening and ran across this caliber and was really intrigued. So dredging up an oldie but I was wonder why they didn’t take the .500ne down to .423”? Bullet options?
Only wondering because the OP mentioned the .404 Jeff and its list of exploits…I’d love a Dakota in .404J and I’d been lusting after an 89b in .450/.400. Anyway just wondered if anyone new the details on why or why not the .500/.423 might have been a better option or no?
I guess I’m imagining the .416 probably filled the gap a bit more perfectly…I like .416 bullet chooses too.
Just building my never will get Christmas list have a good one ya’ll
 
The initial goal was to duplicate the performance of the cartridge 416 Rigby in a rimmed cartridge. That's why in my opinion the choice of caliber was already clear. By the way, I don't see any advantages of the caliber 423 over the caliber 416 and in addition more bullets caliber 416 are available than bullets caliber 423. However, the cartridge does not seem to have been very successful. It is certain that it was in competition with other rimmed cartridges of this caliber class that were well established for double rifles since decades.
 
The initial goal was to duplicate the performance of the cartridge 416 Rigby in a rimmed cartridge. That's why in my opinion the choice of caliber was already clear. By the way, I don't see any advantages of the caliber 423 over the caliber 416 and in addition more bullets caliber 416 are available than bullets caliber 423. However, the cartridge does not seem to have been very successful. It is certain that it was in competition with other rimmed cartridges of this caliber class that were well established for double rifles since decades.
And then for some reason Rigby have come out with the .416 Rigby No2. Sorry but the ship had sailed by then.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
58,206
Messages
1,251,307
Members
103,407
Latest member
LenoraTibb
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

autofire wrote on LIMPOPO NORTH SAFARIS's profile.
Do you have any cull hunts available? 7 days, daily rate plus per animal price?

#plainsgame #hunting #africahunting ##LimpopoNorthSafaris ##africa
 
Top