BeeMaa
AH ambassador
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2017
- Messages
- 7,644
- Reaction score
- 20,768
- Location
- Alexandria, VA USA
- Media
- 148
- Articles
- 1
- Member of
- NRA Life Member, SCI Member
- Hunted
- Eastern US & RSA
Does anyone have experience with removing a cyclops on a Rolex Submariner?
Attached is a factory Sea-Dweller, no cyclops.
Rolex Sea-Dweller 16660 Stainless Steel
Description: Rolex Sea-Dweller 16660 Pre-Owned Rolex Sea-Dweller ref 16660 (1984) "Triple Six" was produced for a little over a decade between 1978 and 1989. It replaced the vintage ref. 1665, bringing with it a sapphire crystal, increased water resistance, and a higher-beat movement. Depending...www.bobswatches.com
The other option is to have the crystal replaced for one without the cyclops. Not sure if AD's will do this, but I know non-AD's who have. And you can keep the crystal with the cyclops in the event that you want to put it back or even sell it.They take a razor sharp chisel to it and it knocks right off. Howard Frum Jewelers in Chicago does it all the time. Unauthorized, non-rolex approved of course.
The trivia: The reason the seadweller does not have the cyclops on the date is that you cannot remove all the gas bubbles at the molecular level between the magnifier and the crystal. At the depths the seadweller is rated, the expansion and contraction of gases would explode/implode the cyclops and perhaps the whole crystal.
My first "nice watch" was a seadweller. I regret having traded it for my twotone sub 15 years ago.