why do people not use premium bullets?

A well placed 150gr Nosler Ballon Tip would be into the lungs, 2-3" behind the shoulder of a bull elk. At 50 yards that should be a chip shot.

Maybe. I've shot 140gr BT's out of my 7mm Magnum at Coues deer. One buck I took the bullet fragmented with about 8" of travel in the deer's thorax. The range to the deer was about 275 yards. A dead deer for sure.

But 50 yards vs 250 yards, a .300Wby vs a 7mm Magnum, a 500-600 pound animal vs a 100lb animal......I wouldn't bet on it.
 
Good for them. Maybe they'll keep their brilliant forward thinking to themselves.
California is know to the state of California to cause cancer. I don't like the government telling me what ammo I can or can't use. Their studies are bs.

Like you can't hunt water fowl with lead because lead gets in the water. Also fisherman go ahead and throw as many lead weights in the water as you want. *Facepalm*.

Cheers

503
 
For my nickels worth if banning lead bullets helps bring back a species from the endangered list I am all for it.

I lived and worked in southern Utah and at that time you necer saw a condor. After the efforts to get hunters to use non lead bullets and a lot of hard work you can now see these birds flying around Zion National Park and the Grand Canyon.

It wasn't just getting the lead out but raising captured birds and a good breeding program that did it.

I also worked with lead telephone cables. In the mid 80's the company started a program to let us know the hazards of lead exposure by issuing us protective gear to wear when working on lead cables. Our exposure would mostly result in handling and getting lead dust on our hands and bodies. I wore that gear every time that I worked on the lead cables.
 
should be on-par w/ a 25-06 unless improved (and i don't see much taper!)
@C.W. Richter A 25-06 won't pus a 100gn that fast. My case has minimal taper, shortened neck and shoulder moved forward with a 30 degree shoulder angle. Load is 58gn of Hogdon Superformance.
Bob
 
Maybe. I've shot 140gr BT's out of my 7mm Magnum at Coues deer. One buck I took the bullet fragmented with about 8" of travel in the deer's thorax. The range to the deer was about 275 yards. A dead deer for sure.

But 50 yards vs 250 yards, a .300Wby vs a 7mm Magnum, a 500-600 pound animal vs a 100lb animal......I wouldn't bet on it.
My point was to say that a BT should not be considered "well placed" if shot into the shoulder of an elk. If you're going to use them, aim back into the lungs and away from the shoulder bone, and 50 yards is a chip shot for any decent rifle shooter to make that happen. I fully agree that a BT is not an optimal bullet choice for elk.

If I were going elk hunting, I'd take a different bullet than a BT because I do believe there are better options. That said, I've used 30-06 with 165gr BT handloads for about 20 years on whitetail deer, including several big 250-300+ lb Kansas bucks, and some big TX feral hogs. My experience has been 100% pass throughs, anywhere from 25 to 300 yards, and just about every angle of broadside or quartering to/away. If the situation arose where I only had these handloads and the right shot opportunity arose for elk sized game or smaller, I fully believe it would perform for me.
 
Like you can't hunt water fowl with lead because lead gets in the water. Also fisherman go ahead and throw as many lead weights in the water as you want. *Facepalm*.

Cheers

503
The switch from lead to steel for waterfowl wasn’t made because lead getting in the water. It was made because of lead poisoning in waterfowl. All birds eat small rocks to help break down their food. They were eating the lead pellets. In a place like Texas where the same holes are shot every weekend during season year after year there are a lot of lead BBs to ingest. Because they are migratory it can then affect bird populations across state and country lines. Upland game is not nearly as concentrated so lead will have minimal effect.
 
California is know to the state of California to cause cancer. I don't like the government telling me what ammo I can or can't use. Their studies are bs.

Like you can't hunt water fowl with lead because lead gets in the water. Also fisherman go ahead and throw as many lead weights in the water as you want. *Facepalm*.

Cheers

503
Question. What are most roofs made out of in California, I mean from the 1980s back?
Is it like NZ and Oz where they’re all made out of corrugated iron? With a water tank for the run off……all healed on with lead head nails and lead flashing….. :unsure: :A Outta:
himmmm maybe they should let us know how lead poisons people….ie in what state it’s most dangerous…as a dust the stuff is la killer but once it’s oxidised It’s fairly harmless. The Romans did suffer from lead poisoning but it was through there makeup not the water pipes. :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
"Why do people not use premium bullets?"

Because bullet placement is more important than bullet construction. Not all game animals need a premium to kill them, and some rifles might shoot a standard cup and core hunting bullet more accurately than a premium bullet.

I now hunt almost exclusively with premium (Barnes TSX and TTSX) bullets in my .375 RUM and my .300 Weatherby.

But I haven't always and still don't always use premium bullets for certain game animals or in all of my hunting rifles.

Here are some (high dollar?) animals that I made one shot, DRT kills on with standard cup and core hunting bullets...

A 375" bull elk from a DIY public land hunt in Montana with a 180 gr Sierra Gameking bullet from my .30-06.
View attachment 556275

My first Montana Bighorn from a DIY Solo hunt with a 117 gr Sierra GameKing bullet from my .257 Ackley
View attachment 556276

Another Montana Bighorn from an Unlimited unit, also on a DIY solo hunt with my .257 Ackley and a 117 gr Sierra GameKing bullet.
View attachment 556274

Another Montana Unlimited Unit Bighorn ram from an Unlimited unit, also on a DIY solo hunt with my .257 Ackley and a 117 gr Sierra GameKing bullet.
View attachment 556277

And this Northwest Territories Dall ram from my first guided hunt, but also shot with my .257 Ackley and a 117 gr Sierra GameKing bullet.
View attachment 556273

Super cool hunts and pictures!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Why do people not use premium bullets?"

Because bullet placement is more important than bullet construction. Not all game animals need a premium to kill them, and some rifles might shoot a standard cup and core hunting bullet more accurately than a premium bullet.

I now hunt almost exclusively with premium (Barnes TSX and TTSX) bullets in my .375 RUM and my .300 Weatherby.

But I haven't always and still don't always use premium bullets for certain game animals or in all of my hunting rifles.

Here are some (high dollar?) animals that I made one shot, DRT kills on with standard cup and core hunting bullets...

A 375" bull elk from a DIY public land hunt in Montana with a 180 gr Sierra Gameking bullet from my .30-06.
View attachment 556275

My first Montana Bighorn from a DIY Solo hunt with a 117 gr Sierra GameKing bullet from my .257 Ackley
View attachment 556276

Another Montana Bighorn from an Unlimited unit, also on a DIY solo hunt with my .257 Ackley and a 117 gr Sierra GameKing bullet.
View attachment 556274

Another Montana Unlimited Unit Bighorn ram from an Unlimited unit, also on a DIY solo hunt with my .257 Ackley and a 117 gr Sierra GameKing bullet.
View attachment 556277

And this Northwest Territories Dall ram from my first guided hunt, but also shot with my .257 Ackley and a 117 gr Sierra GameKing bullet.
View attachment 556273

Bullet placement is definitely the most important thing, but a good bonded bullet and an accurate shot is still a more safe combination especially on an animal like an elk. There are quite a few softer bonded bullets on market to choose now like an accubond for instance. I had to borrow ammo for my Cameroon hunt. I was given generic federal factory ammo with “soft points.” I was glad to have any ammo. It did its job on buffalo and eland. However, I would have trusted a bonded bullet much more, especially on a shoulder shot. I can’t understand why a previous client went on a hunt of that caliber with the cheapest 375 ammo on shelf. I was glad it was there though even if not bonded.

Some great trophies in those photos btw
 
Last edited by a moderator:
something I can't fathom is how people can spend thousands of dollars on a hunt, sometimes thousands on rifles, optics, and all other kinds of gear. and in the same breath, will put a box of Remington core lokts or another budget cup and core bullet in their rifle. And what makes that worse today is that there are affordable premium bullet options now, even in factory ammo, such as the Federal Fusion which is still affordable but uses a better bonded bullet. and I can't deny that standard cup and core bullets are proven for many kinds of game such as whitetail and smaller big games. however, I also can't deny that a premium bullet of any sort will still work better on any game species larger.
I know I'm kind of preaching to the choir with this one but I rest my case.
You can pick on a lot of cup and core bullets for lack of penetration and poor weight retention but not the Remington core lock. It’s been consistently killing big game for a long long time.
 
Question. What are most roofs made out of in California, I mean from the 1980s back?
Is it like NZ and Oz where they’re all made out of corrugated iron? With a water tank for the run off……all healed on with lead head nails and lead flashing….. :unsure: :A Outta:
himmmm maybe they should let us know how lead poisons people….ie in what state it’s most dangerous…as a dust the stuff is la killer but once it’s oxidised It’s fairly harmless. The Romans did suffer from lead poisoning but it was through there makeup not the water pipes. :ROFLMAO:
Don't know about the west coast but on the east coast, pre 1980, roof shingles among other building materials, contained asbestos.
 
The switch from lead to steel for waterfowl wasn’t made because lead getting in the water. It was made because of lead poisoning in waterfowl. All birds eat small rocks to help break down their food. They were eating the lead pellets. In a place like Texas where the same holes are shot every weekend during season year after year there are a lot of lead BBs to ingest. Because they are migratory it can then affect bird populations across state and country lines. Upland game is not nearly as concentrated so lead will have minimal effect.
Right. If they'll eat BBs they'll eat fishing weights.
 
There has been lots of building materials that have been banned due to the health problems associated with them. They caused no problems until they were tested to see just what will happen when yo breath or get them into your system. Most are just fine as long as you leave them alone. Look at asbestos, as long as it's protective wrap is in place it is good, damage that wrap or need to remove it and you are in for a lot of problems and cost to do so.

Same with lead pipes and soldier, but in their case the lead will leach out into the water system. Lead pain is the same, it is fine as long as it is on the wall or window seals, but when kids start eating it problems come up.
 
Those Remington Core Locs work, plain and simple. Along with the vast majority of those other cup and core bullets. And for the most part the premium bullet really isn't needed.

I moved on to the monolithic copper Barnes bullets 20+ years ago, but all of the animals that I killed before that time are just as dead when I shot them with that old trustworthy cup and core bullet

I’ve never had issues with “old fashioned” bullets.
 
I actually think California has pushed a lot of great eviro law. I remember in the boat field when they banned linear poly and people thought it was the end of the world. Within a few weeks they turned to water based (so called) linear poly, and we lived. Guitar finishes were harder, but eventually we got on top of it, both moving to old natural finishes, and for goodness sake, Taylor figured out how to powder coat wood, I think. They banned Harley type engines, and Harley caved, but S&S figured out how to handle the oil escape. Sometimes they made the world better.

But these days you can't buy a glass without there being a disclaimer that the state of california has determined glass causes cancer. Probably the work of the company's legal department, but it has moved on to where everything one hears is just BS now.
 
Right. If they'll eat BBs they'll eat fishing weights.
Most people are going to shoot a box of shells to get a limit of ducks. Bad shots and undisciplined shooters even more. 1 box of 3” lead 12 gauge is 2.5 lbs of lead BBs. It’s a significant amount more lead compared to losing a few fishing sinkers.
 
Seyfired wrote some articles, as doubtless others could have talking about how fantastic the performance of regular bullets at mid velocities from the likes of the of 30-40 was. Once you go magnums, and push bullets to destruction, then you need premium bullets, muzzle brakes, new ears, special pads, and a guy carrying a tripod so you can hit stuff. Then you get lasers, turret scopes, and on it goes. The Universe is out of balance.

"... 220 and 215 grain bullets at about 2,000 fps"

Is is this load level, the original one, we are going to think about here. It is a load that has some true magnificence hidden in its apparently archaic ballistics. With old-style speed and old style bullets they behave much like the most modern magnum with the finest bullets we can devise. Behave that is, after they hit meat - and they do it without ear-crushing roar, or bone-jarring recoil."
 
Most people are going to shoot a box of shells to get a limit of ducks. Bad shots and undisciplined shooters even more. 1 box of 3” lead 12 gauge is 2.5 lbs of lead BBs. It’s a significant amount more lead compared to losing a few fishing sinkers.
And while there are different kinds of shooting, if one puts a set out in a marsh to draw birds into areas where they believe other birds will be feeding off the bottom, then shower the area with lead, yikes. Whereas I can be jigging for bass in waters adjacent to 300 foot depth, and the junk will collect in the deep waters. Alsom in fishing circles, the alternatives are actually better, there maleability is not going to affect your cast, as it does a shotgun pattern. Tungsten is denser, and generally better.
 
smallish? where are you hunting? SGLs?? State Forest in the MOFN? We have shot 250 lb deer our entire lives on farms and state land adjacent to same! Sure, my friends in Sask shoot em 100 lb larger on farms, but some really big deer reside in PA. You must simply show restraint! But, as you suggest, for woods hunting, nothing premium is required at all. We have fields 400-1,500 yds long, so one must be prepared. A better rig, handloading, trigger, optics and handloading suggested for long shots on the BIG deer that do reside in PA! ;) If you're in scrappy, rocky low-grade state land-that .35 Rem w/ Rem ammo is just fine. To ALL PA residents: Don't shoot little (young) big Bucks! Let them grow up like many of us do!!! You shot Gary Alt. Don't do that again!
Naw I was just joking, we have decent sized deer lol. But they don't require premium ammo from a 30.06 but I kinda think the bears and big boars do lol
 
You can pick on a lot of cup and core bullets for lack of penetration and poor weight retention but not the Remington core lock. It’s been consistently killing big game for a long long time.
@K95
I've never had a problem with Hornady interlocks ar the plastict tip version the SST.
Their round noses seem to hold together well.
I wonder how the 117grain round nose would go in the 25. I know it was loaded in the 257 Weatherby.
Bob
 

Forum statistics

Threads
58,171
Messages
1,250,424
Members
103,250
Latest member
LourdesKre
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

autofire wrote on LIMPOPO NORTH SAFARIS's profile.
Do you have any cull hunts available? 7 days, daily rate plus per animal price?

#plainsgame #hunting #africahunting ##LimpopoNorthSafaris ##africa
 
Top